Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAfkhami, Maryam
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-11T09:18:50Z
dc.date.available2021-12-11T09:18:50Z
dc.date.issued2021/11/02en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/65669
dc.description.abstractAbstract Introduction: Since in the late 2019, the new disease called Kavid 19 in Wuhan China has occurred in several months. The purpose of this study was to investigate the narration, reliability and number of questions and countries using specific questionnaires and tools designed for Cavid 19. Materials and Methods: In order to achieve systematic search studies, four databases: PUB MED), Scopus, Embase, Web of Science) were performed. Studies that were used in their abstract were selected and analyzed by studying the full text of the study designed. Data were extracted according to the checklist. A randomized model was used in Stata (Statacorp, Version 16) for measurement. Results: Out of 4201 studies, 156 studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria with the aim of designing a Covid-specific questionnaire. China has the highest number of studies in this field with 25 studies. 48% of the target group studies are chosen by the general public. Knowledge, attitude and practice were the most common among the objectives of the study. How to compile questions Using the text review method is more popular than other methods. The maximum and minimum number of domains were 10 and 1 and the maximum and minimum number of questions were 223 and 4. 78% of the studies used an online questionnaire. 5% of the studies mentioned method and amount of validity and 56% mentioned methods of reliability and amount. The results of meta-analysis showed that the validity of CVR was 0.77 and CVI was 0.76. The overall size of knowledge reliability was 0.76, attitude 0.77, performance and preventive measures 0.78, mental health 0.78, lifestyle 0.80, effects and complications 0.85, others 0.80. Discussion: The results of the study showed that the specific questionnaires designed to conduct Covid-19 studies do not have a good validity and reliability status and the reporting status of the validation stages of the studies is not satisfactory.en_US
dc.language.isofaen_US
dc.publisherTabriz University of Medical Sciences,School of Management and Medical Informaticsen_US
dc.relation.isversionoffaen_US
dc.subjectCovid 19, Meta-analysis, questionnaire, validity and reliability.en_US
dc.titleSystematic review of specifications and validation information of specific questionnaires designed for Covid 19en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.supervisorAzami Aghdash, Saber
dc.contributor.departmenthealth managementen_US
dc.description.disciplineHealth policyen_US
dc.description.degreebacheloren_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record