Systematic review of specifications and validation information of specific questionnaires designed for Covid 19
چکیده
Abstract
Introduction: Since in the late 2019, the new disease called Kavid 19 in Wuhan China has occurred in several months. The purpose of this study was to investigate the narration, reliability and number of questions and countries using specific questionnaires and tools designed for Cavid 19.
Materials and Methods: In order to achieve systematic search studies, four databases: PUB MED), Scopus, Embase, Web of Science) were performed. Studies that were used in their abstract were selected and analyzed by studying the full text of the study designed. Data were extracted according to the checklist. A randomized model was used in Stata (Statacorp, Version 16) for measurement.
Results: Out of 4201 studies, 156 studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria with the aim of designing a Covid-specific questionnaire. China has the highest number of studies in this field with 25 studies. 48% of the target group studies are chosen by the general public. Knowledge, attitude and practice were the most common among the objectives of the study. How to compile questions Using the text review method is more popular than other methods. The maximum and minimum number of domains were 10 and 1 and the maximum and minimum number of questions were 223 and 4. 78% of the studies used an online questionnaire. 5% of the studies mentioned method and amount of validity and 56% mentioned methods of reliability and amount. The results of meta-analysis showed that the validity of CVR was 0.77 and CVI was 0.76. The overall size of knowledge reliability was 0.76, attitude 0.77, performance and preventive measures 0.78, mental health 0.78, lifestyle 0.80, effects and complications 0.85, others 0.80.
Discussion: The results of the study showed that the specific questionnaires designed to conduct Covid-19 studies do not have a good validity and reliability status and the reporting status of the validation stages of the studies is not satisfactory.