Managerial Predictors of Traffic Injuries in Tabriz Hospitals
Abstract
SUMMERY
Background: Motor vehicle accidents are the leading cause of death in adolescents
and young adults worldwide. Road traffic fatality is in critical situation in our
country nowadays and about 28000 individuals die from road traffic accidents
annually. Previous studies on trauma care in Iran have mainly focused on prehospital
trauma care. This paper deals with the predictors of traffic injury deaths and
distribution in hospitals.
Objectives: the objectives of the present study were to investigate the survival and
predictors of 2-wheel vehicle and pedestrian traffic injury outcomes (recovery,
deaths, refers and discharge without medical advice) in hospitals of Tabriz, Iran.
We aimed these objectives with focus on outcome differences in various owned
hospitals.
Methods: This longitudinal study reviewed about 15,331 injures in 21 hospitals
in Tabriz city over the time period between March 2012 and March 2013 and the
needed data on motorcycle, bicycle and pedestrian (MBP) traffic injuries referred to
hospitals were collected from hospital Information Systems (HISs). Operation codes
were extracted according to ICD10 codes and the data were analyzed using STATA
13 statistical software package. Descriptive statistical methods and appropriate
graphs were used to summarize the data. Chi-square and Cogrank tests were used
for bi-variate analysis. Relative risk to investigate the association between variables,
relative risks along with 95% confidence intervals was also reported. The
confidence intervals for relative risks were evaluated using Exact Estimation.
ظ
Results: The total death of traffic injuries was 266 of them 184 were among all
inpatient traffic injured, 166 among MBP inpatients and 82 were among outpatients.
Young MBPs (<20<40 years of age), experienced higher injury rate than older ones
(48.4%), (p < 0.05) and 26% were pedestrian, 32% motorcyclist, 4.6% cyclist and
37.1% non-MBPs. Most of the 266 deaths, 251 deaths (2.2% of all traffic injuries)
happened in public teaching hospitals. Fourteen deaths (0.4%) happened in other
public hospitals and 1 death (0.35%) in private hospitals. The difference, using the
Fisher's exact test, was significant (p<0.01). Hazard ratio for death of the victims
referred to public teaching hospitals 5.8 times more than other hospitals. RR=5.7
CI=0.95 3.4 – 9.6. Likelihood of admission for victims transported by EMS was
1.13 times more than victims not transported by EMS (RR=0.95 1.13-1.22, CI:
1.05-1.2). From 266 death, 265 (99.62%) happened in rank1 hospitals and 1
(0.38%) in rank 2.
Conclusion: A precision attention of all these predictors will enable Officials in
planning for effective training programs and death control measures. These can also
be used in the legislation of traffic laws and regulations and managerial plans of
hospitals and pre-hospitals.
Keywords: “Traffic”, “Accident”, “Hospital Administration”, “traffic victims”,
“injuries” , “traffic injuries”, “length of stay”, “mortality “