• English
    • Persian
  • Persian 
    • English
    • Persian
  • ورود
مشاهده آیتم 
  •   صفحه اصلی مخزن دانش
  • TBZMED Published Academics Works
  • Published Articles
  • مشاهده آیتم
  •   صفحه اصلی مخزن دانش
  • TBZMED Published Academics Works
  • Published Articles
  • مشاهده آیتم
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Uptake of liquid-based cytology as an adjunct to conventional cytology for cervical screening in NSW, Australia: A cross-sectional and population-based cohort analysis

Thumbnail
نمایش/بازکردن
1471-2458-13-1196.pdf (358.7Kb)
تاریخ
2013
نویسنده
Aminisani, N
Armstrong, BK
Canfell, K
Metadata
نمایش پرونده کامل آیتم
چکیده
Background: Cervical screening is currently recommended every two years in sexually active women aged 18-20 to 69 years in Australia. Direct replacement of conventional cytology with liquid-based cytology (LBC) for cervical screening was rejected for public funding on grounds of cost-effectiveness, first in 2002 and again in 2009, but LBC is performed as an adjunct to conventional cytology in women who elect to pay. The objective of this study was to describe prevalence and predictors of use of LBC in Australia's most populous state, New South Wales (NSW). Methods. We performed cross-sectional and population-based cohort analyses using data from the state Pap Test Register in NSW. We calculated the age-adjusted proportion of women aged 20-69 years electing to have adjunctive LBC over the period from 2006-2010. We also calculated the fully-adjusted odds ratios for the association between subsequent LBC use and age, socioeconomic status, place of residence, previous cytological history and provider type in a cohort of 360,247 women who had an index cervical cytology test in 2006-8. Results: Uptake of LBC varied between 29.7% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 29.5-30.0%) in 2006/7 and 26.6% (95% CI: 26.4-26.9%) in 2009/10. LBC was more likely to be used in women aged 30-44 years, if it had been used previously (OR13.58, 95% CI: 13.33-13.84), if the previous test result was abnormal (OR2.62, 95% CI:2.53-2.72) or unsatisfactory (OR2.37, 95% CI:2.27-3.47), or if a gynaecologist requested the test (OR1.50, 95% CI:1.46-1.54). Uptake was least for women in remote/very remote areas (OR0.68; 95% CI:0.57-0.80 referenced to those in major cities) and in lower socioeconomic groups (OR 0.41, 95% CI:0.40-0.42 for lowest versus highest SES quintile). Conclusion: In the current environment in NSW, Australia, in which public funding for LBC has not been available, adjunctive uptake of LBC depends strongly on a woman's age, her screening history and socioeconomic factors. These findings provide important context for a current review of technologies used in the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia. ط¢آ© 2013Aminisani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
URI
http://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/58654
Collections
  • Published Articles

مخزن دانش دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز در نرم افزار دی اسپیس، کپی رایت 2018 ©  
تماس با ما | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

مرور

همه مخزنجامعه ها و مجموعه هابراساس تاریخ انتشارنویسنده هاعنوانهاموضوعاین مجموعهبراساس تاریخ انتشارنویسنده هاعنوانهاموضوع

حساب من

ورودثبت نام

مخزن دانش دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز در نرم افزار دی اسپیس، کپی رایت 2018 ©  
تماس با ما | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV