• English
    • Persian
  • Persian 
    • English
    • Persian
  • ورود
مشاهده آیتم 
  •   صفحه اصلی مخزن دانش
  • TBZMED Published Academics Works
  • Published Articles
  • مشاهده آیتم
  •   صفحه اصلی مخزن دانش
  • TBZMED Published Academics Works
  • Published Articles
  • مشاهده آیتم
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparison of Microleakage of Three Adhesive Systems in Class V Composite Restorations Prepared with Er,Cr:YSGG Laser

Thumbnail
تاریخ
2010
نویسنده
Kimyai, S
Ajami, AA
Chaharom, MEE
Oskoee, JS
Metadata
نمایش پرونده کامل آیتم
چکیده
Objective: This study compared microleakage of three adhesives in class V (CI V) composite restorations prepared with Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Background Data: Changes produced on enamel and dentin surfaces subsequent to laser irradiation influence microleakage of composite restorations. Materials and Methods: CI V cavities were prepared in 80 sound extracted human premolars with Er,Cr:YSGG laser. The teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 20). In group 1, a total-etch adhesive was used, and two-step and one-step self-etch adhesives were used in groups 2 and 3, respectively. Group 4 was the control group with no adhesives. Following restoration and thermocycling, microleakage was evaluated. To compare microleakage in occlusal and gingival margins in each group, the Wilcoxon test was used. Kruskal-Wallis analysis was used for comparison of occlusal and gingival microleakage, and two-by-two comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: There were significant differences in microleakage between occlusal and gingival margins in each group except for the control group. Significant differences were observed in occlusal and gingival microleakage among all the groups. Two-by-two comparisons revealed significant differences in occlusal microleakage between the control group and the other groups. There were significant differences in gingival microleakage between groups 1 and 2 and groups 1 and 3; however, differences in gingival microleakage between groups 2 and 3 were not significant. Conclusion: With all the adhesives, microleakage was significantly higher in gingival margins compared with occlusal margins. In occlusal margins, there were no significant differences in microleakage among the three adhesives. In gingival margins, self-etch adhesives revealed less microleakage than the total-etch adhesive.
URI
http://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/50628
Collections
  • Published Articles

مخزن دانش دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز در نرم افزار دی اسپیس، کپی رایت 2018 ©  
تماس با ما | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

مرور

همه مخزنجامعه ها و مجموعه هابراساس تاریخ انتشارنویسنده هاعنوانهاموضوعاین مجموعهبراساس تاریخ انتشارنویسنده هاعنوانهاموضوع

حساب من

ورودثبت نام

مخزن دانش دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز در نرم افزار دی اسپیس، کپی رایت 2018 ©  
تماس با ما | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV