• English
    • Persian
  • English 
    • English
    • Persian
  • Login
View Item 
  •   KR-TBZMED Home
  • TBZMED Published Academics Works
  • Published Articles
  • View Item
  •   KR-TBZMED Home
  • TBZMED Published Academics Works
  • Published Articles
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Biogeneric Recombinant Activated Factor VII (AryoSeven (TM)) and Activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrates (FEIBA (TM)) to Treat Hemophilia A Patients with Inhibitors in Iran

Thumbnail
Date
2016
Author
Golestani, M
Eshghi, P
Rasekh, HR
Cheraghali, AM
Salamzadeh, J
Naderi, M
Managhchi, MR
Hoorfar, H
Toogeh, GR
Imani, A
Khodayari, MT
Habibpanah, B
Hantooshzadeh, R
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Nowadays, bypassing agents such as recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) are used to treat bleeding episodes in the Hemophilia patients with inhibitors. AryoSeven (R) is an Iranian biogeneric rFVIIa with homogeneity of efficacy and the nature to NovoSeven in a comparative trial. The current clinical trial aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of FEIBA and AryoSeven (R) by Decision Analytic Model according to the Iranian healthcare system. An open label, multi-center, crossover clinical trial was designed. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on their prior tendency to one or none of the products. To determine the premium therapeutic strategy, the Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. Protocol F led to more treatment success in group F than the other groups (P= 0.03). Also, there was a significant statistical difference between the mean of effectiveness scores in the groups using protocol F (P = 0.01). The effectiveness of protocol F and A were 89% and 72%, respectively. ICER cost US$ 5,146 to manage an episode of bleeding to get one more unit of effectiveness using FEIBA VS. AryoSeven. Although the results showed that AryoSeven was more cost-effective compared to FEIBA, the two strategies were undominated. In other words, both medicines can be applied in the first line of the treatment if the cost of FEIBA was reduced. The present clinical trial was registered at IRCT website, under ID No. 2013020612380N1.
URI
http://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/47095
Collections
  • Published Articles

Knowledge repository of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences using DSpace software copyright © 2018  HTMLMAP
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of KR-TBZMEDCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Knowledge repository of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences using DSpace software copyright © 2018  HTMLMAP
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV