Raising concerns about the Sepsis-3 definitions.
Date
2018Author
Sartelli, M
Kluger, Y
Ansaloni, L
Hardcastle, TC
Rello, J
Watkins, RR
Bassetti, M
Giamarellou, E
Coccolini, F
Abu-Zidan, FM
Adesunkanmi, AK
Augustin, G
Baiocchi, GL
Bala, M
Baraket, O
Beltran, MA
Jusoh, AC
Demetrashvili, Z
De Simone, B
de Souza, HP
Cui, Y
Davies, RJ
Dhingra, S
Diaz, JJ
Di Saverio, S
Dogjani, A
Elmangory, MM
Enani, MA
Ferrada, P
Fraga, GP
Frattima, S
Ghnnam, W
Gomes, CA
Kanj, SS
Karamarkovic, A
Kenig, J
Khamis, F
Khokha, V
Koike, K
Kok, KYY
Isik, A
Labricciosa, FM
Latifi, R
Lee, JG
Litvin, A
Machain, GM
Manzano-Nunez, R
Major, P
Marwah, S
McFarlane, M
Memish, ZA
Mesina, C
Moore, EE
Moore, FA
Naidoo, N
Negoi, I
Ofori-Asenso, R
Olaoye, I
Ordo?ez, CA
Ouadii, M
Paolillo, C
Picetti, E
Pintar, T
Ponce-de-Leon, A
Pupelis, G
Reis, T
Sakakushev, B
Kafil, HS
Sato, N
Shah, JN
Siribumrungwong, B
Talving, P
Tranأ , C
Ulrych, J
Yuan, KC
Catena, F
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery appreciates the great effort of the task force who derived and validated the Sepsis-3 definitions and considers the new definitions an important step forward in the evolution of our understanding of sepsis. Nevertheless, more than a year after their publication, we have a few concerns regarding the use of the Sepsis-3 definitions.