• English
    • Persian
  • English 
    • English
    • Persian
  • Login
View Item 
  •   KR-TBZMED Home
  • School of Dentistry
  • Theses(D)
  • View Item
  •   KR-TBZMED Home
  • School of Dentistry
  • Theses(D)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Effect of curing unit type of composite and gingival margin location on the cervical marginal integrity of bulk - filled class II resin composite restorations

Thumbnail
Author
Mahmood Bahari Elmira Jafari
Siyavash Savadi Oskoee
dentistry
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the type of light-curing unit, composite resin type and the location of the gingival margin on gap formation in Cl II cavities restored using the bulk-fill technique with a silorane-based and a methacrylate-based composite resin and light-cured with QTH and LED light-curing units. Materials and methods: Sixty third molars were selected and two Cl II cavities were prepared on each tooth, one at the mesial aspect 1 mm coronal to the CEJ and the other one at the distal aspect 1 mm apical to the CEJ. The teeth were assigned to 4 groups. In group A, the cavities were restored using the bulk-fill technique with Filtek P90 composite resin and its adhesive system, followed by light-curing with QTH light-curing unit. The cavities in group B were restored in a manner similar to that in group A but light-cured with an LED light-curing unit. In group C, the cavities were restored using the bulk-fill technique with X-tra Fil composite resin and Clearfil SE Bond adhesive system and light-cured with a QTH light-curing unit. The cavities in group D were restored in a manner similar to that in group C but light-cured with an LED light-curing unit. The gaps were evaluated under a stereomicroscope at 60. Data were analyzed with GLM test. In case of statistical significance (P<0.05), post hoc Bonferroni test was used for further analyses. Results: The type of the light-curing unit had no effect on gap formation. However, the results were significant in relation to the composite resin type and margin location (P<0.001). The cumulative effects of light-curing unitgingival margin and light-curing unitcomposite resin type were not significant; however, the cumulative effect of composite rein typegingival margin was significant (P=0.04). Conclusion: X-tra Fil composite resin exhibited smaller gaps compared with Filtek P90 composite resin with both QTH and LED light-curing units. Both composite resins exhibited smaller gaps at enamel margins compared to dentinal margins
URI
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/16900
Collections
  • Theses(D)

Knowledge repository of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences using DSpace software copyright © 2018  HTMLMAP
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of KR-TBZMEDCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Knowledge repository of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences using DSpace software copyright © 2018  HTMLMAP
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV