Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorTahsini Tekantapeh, Sepideh
dc.contributor.advisorGhojazadeh, Morteza
dc.contributor.authorFereidouni, Fatemeh
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-25T05:27:59Z
dc.date.available2025-06-25T05:27:59Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/72490
dc.description.abstractProne positioning (PP) is a low-cost method with minimal risk to the patient that improves the oxygenation of patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) due to COVID-19 pneumonia, thereby reducing their need for tracheal intubation (TI) and transferring to the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to overview the results of all previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses to examine the net effect of PP on oxygenation, the rate of TI and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases from December 2019 through 2022 without publication language restriction for systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies on PP vs. supine position (SP) in conscious patients with hypoxic respiratory failure COVID-19. After study selection, data were extracted from published meta-analyses and pooled by comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) software version 2.2.064 to achieve effect sizes. They were analyzed for TI and mortality rates dichotomous variables, and the results were shown as pooled odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous variables such as oxygenation indices (PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2) were also analyzed, and the data were shown as mean differences (MD) with lower and upper CI. The level of statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: Twelve systematic reviews and meta-analyses with 19,651 patients and six systematic reviews with 2,911 patients were included in this Review of Reviews (total: 22,562). PP treatment significantly reduced the rate of TI (OR = 0.639, %95 CI (0.492, 0.829); P-value = 0.001) and decreased mortality (OR = 0.363, %95 CI (0.240, 0.549), P-value < 0.001). There was no difference in PaO2/FiO2 (MD = 3.591[- 40.881, 48.062]; P-value = 0.874) and SpO2 percent (MD = 1.641[- 4.441, 7.723]; P-value = 0.597).en_US
dc.language.isofaen_US
dc.publisherTabriz University of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicineen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/72489en_US
dc.subjectAcute hypoxic respiratory failureen_US
dc.subjectAwakeen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectProne positionen_US
dc.subjectSupine positionen_US
dc.titleProne Positioning Effect on oxygenation, ICU admission , survival and mortality in Awake Non-Intubated Severe COVID-19 Patients with Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysisen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.supervisorSoleimanpour, Hassan
dc.identifier.docno6011993en_US
dc.identifier.callno11993en_US
dc.description.disciplineMedicineen_US
dc.description.degreeMD Degreeen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record