نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم

dc.contributor.advisorMirghafourvand, Mojgan
dc.contributor.advisorEbrahimi, Fatemeh
dc.contributor.authorRafatnia, Masoumeh
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-09T08:31:32Z
dc.date.available2025-03-09T08:31:32Z
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/72141
dc.description.abstractAbstract Introduction: Vaginal and perineal ruptures are among the most prevalent complications of childbirth, which may occur spontaneously during childbirth or through a surgical incision (episiotomy) in the vagina or perineum. Delayed episiotomy wound healing and its resultant pain can culminate in short-term and long-term maternal and neonatal complications. Therefore, the present study was conducted aiming to investigate the effect of propolis topical ointment on episiotomy pain severity (the primary consequence) and wound healing (the secondary consequence) and to determine the related complications. Methods: The present research was a triple-blinded randomized clinical trial conducted on 72 puerperal women, gravid 1 and 2 (36 women in the propolis ointment group and 36 women in the placebo group), referring to Taleghani Hospital, Tabriz, Iran, from April to December 2023. The intervention group received propolis ointment, and the control group received a placebo (Eucerin ointment) as much as a knuckle (2 cm) in the perineal area twice a day, 12 hours apart (±2 hours), for 10 days. The data were collected using a demographic and obstetric questionnaire, the Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) Scale, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) by the researcher during the first 12 hours and on the 10±1 postpartum day. The data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test because of the non-normal distribution of data. Results: Means ± standard deviations (SDs) of the REEDA score in the propolis and placebo groups were 0.7±0.8 and 0.7±0.7 on the first postpartum day and 0.6±1.0 and 0.3±0.7 on the 10th postpartum day, respectively, indicating no statistically significant difference between the two groups before (p=0.912) and after (p=0.413) the intervention. Means ± SDs of the VAS score in the propolis and placebo groups were 3.7±2.3 and 3.3±1.6 on the first postpartum day and 2.4±2.1 and 2.0±1.3 on the 10th postpartum day, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference between the two groups before (p=0.568) and after (p=0.573) the intervention. Conclusion: According to the present study results, propolis ointment does not lead to increasing wound healing rate and relieving episiotomy pain. However, further research is recommended to confirm the study findings.en_US
dc.language.isofaen_US
dc.publisherTabriz University of Medical Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwiferyen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/72140en_US
dc.subjectKeywords: Propolis, Pain severity, Wound healing, Episiotomyen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Topical Ointment of Propolis on Severity of Episiotomy Pain and Wound Healing: A Triple-Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trialen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.supervisorKamalifard, Mahin
dc.contributor.supervisorGhanbari Homayi, Solmaz
dc.identifier.docnoپ1146en_US
dc.identifier.callno1146en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMidwifery Egocationen_US
dc.description.disciplineMidwiferyen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Midwiferyen_US


فایلهای درون آیتم

فایلهاسایزفرمتنمایش

هیچ فایل مرتبطی وجود ندارد

این آیتم در مجموعه های زیر مشاهده می شود

نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم