نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم

dc.contributor.authorGhasemi, Sina
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-08T07:17:18Z
dc.date.available2024-04-08T07:17:18Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/70483
dc.description.abstractProximal humerus fractures are one of the most common upper limb fractures and cause shoulder and upper limb dysfunction. It is important to monitor upper limb function after proximal humerus fractures. After surgery for these types of fractures, especially tow-part fractures, a specific protocol that is accepted by everyone has not been explained. Therefore, this study will be conducted with the aim of comparing the function of the upper limb using the two methods for immobilization arm, Sling and Abduction Pillows after the surgery of Tow-Part fractures of the proximal humerus in order to achieve acceptable results for improving the function of the upper limb in these types of fractures. Materials and Methods: In this study, 40 patients who undergo surgery due to tow-part fractures of the proximal humerus were included in the study. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups. Slings were used for one group and abduction pillows for the other group for 4-6 weeks after surgery. Upper limb functional status was measured using the DASH instrument and pain intensity was also measured using the VAS instrument in the first week, the sixth week, and twelve and the 24th week after surgery and compared between the two groups. Also assess the need for physiotherapy in these patients and compared between the two groups.The consumption of oral painkillers was compared in two groups Results: Examination of the ROM range of motion indicated that the range of motion in the Abduction pillow group patients was significantly better than the simple sling group in the short term (P˂0.05); But in the final result, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, meaning that the results of these two groups are almost the same in the long term (P>0.05). the range of motion of the shoulder joint was non-significantly better in the long term in the group using Abduction pillows than the other group. The need for physical therapy was clearly higher in the sling group than in the abduction pillows group(P<0/05). At all times, the intensity of pain and the amount of painkillers consumed in the simple sling group are significantly higher than the abduction pillows group (P<0.05). The DASH score was non-significantly lower in the abduction pillows group than the Sling group at all times (P>0.05).en_US
dc.language.isofaen_US
dc.publisherTabriz University of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicineen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/70482en_US
dc.subjectTow-part fractures of the proximal humerusen_US
dc.subjectabduction pillowsen_US
dc.subjectsimple slingen_US
dc.titleComparison of Upper Limb Function with Sling and Abduction Pillows after Proximal Humerus Two-Part Fracture Surgeryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.supervisorElmi, Asghar
dc.identifier.docno6011492en_US
dc.identifier.callno11492en_US
dc.description.disciplineOrthopedics Surgeryen_US
dc.description.degreeSpecialty Degreeen_US


فایلهای درون آیتم

فایلهاسایزفرمتنمایش

هیچ فایل مرتبطی وجود ندارد

این آیتم در مجموعه های زیر مشاهده می شود

نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم