Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJalali, Saleh
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-21T07:06:14Z
dc.date.available2023-01-21T07:06:14Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/68045
dc.description.abstractChronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory disease of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. The most common treatment for this disease is endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). The postoperative management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has traditionally utilized corticosteroid therapies in topical formulations. Corticosteroids have been shown to facilitate early mucosalization, reduce edema, and decrease the rate of bacterial recovery, thereby improving clinical healing and thus surgical outcomes. The selection of an effective packing method to prevent postoperative complications and recurrence following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery remains ambiguous at present. Therefore, the aim of the present study was compare the effectiveness of nasal packing following endoscopic sinus surgery with topical injection of triamcinolone and foam gel containing triamcinolone. Methods: Patients who referred to Sina Hospital in 1400 due to chronic rhinosinusitis were included in the study and were randomly divided into one of two groups: the group receiving foam gel containing triamcinolone after ESS and the group receiving topical injection of triamcinolone after ESS. The patients were followed up for 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively for edema and complications. Relevant information was recorded in a checklist and the results were analyzed by SPSS software version 22. Results: Patients did not differ significantly in terms of demographic characteristics. There was no difference in average endoscopic scores between the two groups at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months (P = 0.01). the amount of bleeding was significantly lower in the triamcinolone-impregnated gelfom group. Nasal obstruction, olfactory problem, headache and facial pain were less in the triamcinolone-impregnated gelfom group than in the triamcinolone injection group, which was not statistically significant.en_US
dc.language.isofaen_US
dc.publisherTabriz University of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicineen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/68044en_US
dc.subjectChronic rhinosinusitisen_US
dc.subjectGelfoam impregnated with triamcinoloneen_US
dc.subjectTopical injection of triamcinoloneen_US
dc.subjectEndoscopic sinus surgeryen_US
dc.titlecomparison of results of frontal sinus surgery with direct injection of cortisone and foam gel containing cortisoneen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.supervisorMousavi Aghdas, Mehrnoush
dc.identifier.docno6010735en_US
dc.identifier.callno10735en_US
dc.description.disciplineENTen_US
dc.description.degreespecialty Degreeen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record