Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMahmoodpour, Ata
dc.contributor.advisorSagaleini, Seyed Hadi
dc.contributor.authorTalebi, Bagher
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T07:14:40Z
dc.date.available2022-11-07T07:14:40Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/67621
dc.description.abstractDue to the lack of incentive spirometry studies in developing countries and the unavailability of this device in all centers and on the other hand due to the ease of deep exhalation against positive pressure, in this study the effect of incentive spirometry compared to Deep exhaustion versus positive pressure in reducing pulmonary complications after thoracotomy and upper abdomen. Materials and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study that was performed during 2019-2020 with the participation of 90 patients candidates for thoracotomy and upper abdomen surgery and hospitalized in the intensive care unit of Imam Reza Hospital (Tabriz University of Medical Sciences). They underwent general anesthesia and all were extubated after surgery. Two types of treatment were performed for patients admitted to the intensive care unit. For one group, spirometry encouragement (every three hours for ten minutes) and for the other group, deep exhalation against positive pressure (inflating a balloon - every three hours for ten minutes) for three days for both. The group was done. Data from pulmonary volumes and arterial blood gases, the need for mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit and complications and mortality were recorded in both groups. Data were collected in SPSS Ver21 software and compared with T test and chi square statistical tests with alpha significance level less than 0.05. Results: At the end of the first day, it was seen that there was no statistically significant difference between the variables Pao2 and Paco2 (P <0.05); However, the comparison of these variables on the second and third day showed a statistically significant relationship between the two groups, so that a good improvement in the incentive spirometry method was observed in patients (P <0.05); Also, the rate of atelectasis, duration of hospitalization, need for adjuvant oxygen in the stimulus spirometry group is significantly lower than the deep exhalation group against positive pressure (P <0.05) while in the need for mechanical ventilation, the duration of hospitalization There is no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the intensive care unit, pneumonia and mortality (P <0.05).en_US
dc.language.isofaen_US
dc.publisherTabriz University of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicineen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/67620en_US
dc.subjectIncentive Spirometryen_US
dc.subjectThoracotomyen_US
dc.subjectDeep Exposure to Positive Pressureen_US
dc.subjectIntensive Careen_US
dc.titleComparing the efficacy of incentive spirometry and PEP in reducing post operative pulmonary complications after thoracotomy and upper abdominal surgeryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.supervisorShadvar, Kamran
dc.contributor.supervisorMontazer, Majid
dc.identifier.docno6010625en_US
dc.identifier.callno10625en_US
dc.description.disciplineAnesthesiologyen_US
dc.description.degreeSpecialty Degreeen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record