نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم

dc.contributor.authorHadilou, Mahdi
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-06T05:14:55Z
dc.date.available2022-09-06T05:14:55Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/67176
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Composite resin restorations need to be repaired or replaced, over different time periods following placement due to different reasons. Based on the extent of the defected part, repair may be a viable option to replacement. Recent advances in adhesive dentistry, and equivalent or even superior clinical survival rates of repaired composite resin restorations than replaced ones have led to a paradigm shift from full replacement of slightly defective old composite resin restorations towards repairing the defected portion. Objectives: This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of common surface treatments on the long-term repair bond strength of aged composite resin restorations and to rank and compare them. Methods: In-vitro studies evaluating the methacrylate-based composite resins subjected to rigorous aging protocols before and after being repaired with a new composite were included. A frequentist network meta-analysis was carried out using a random-effects model. P-scores were used to rank the efficacy of the surface treatments. Also, the global and node-split inconsistencies were evaluated. Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched until July 07, 2022. Results: Twenty-six studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that the application of silane and a total-etch (shear MD 32.35 MPa, 95% CI 18.25 to 46.40, P-score 0.95; tensile MD 33.25 MPa, 95% CI 25.07 to 41.44; P-score 0.77) or a self-etch (shear MD 38.87 MPa, 95% CI 21.60 to 56.14, P-score 0.99; tensile MD 32.52 MPa, 95% CI 23.74 to 41.29; P-score 0.73) adhesion protocol subsequent to the roughening with diamond bur, produced the highest (micro)tensile and (micro)shear bond strengths compared to diamond bur alone as control group. There was no difference between self- and total-etch adhesive protocols. Mechanical surface treatments yielded greater bond strength when used alongside the chemical adhesive agents.Conclusion: Ultimately, it is possible to achieve acceptable repair bond strength using common dental clinic equipment. Therefore, clinicians could consider repairing old composite resins rather than replacing them.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTabriz University of Medical Sciences, Dentistry Facultyen_US
dc.subjectmethacrylate-based composite resin, surface treatment, repair bond strength, aging, network meta-analysisen_US
dc.titleEffect of Different Surface Treatments on the Long-term Repair Bond Strength of Aged Methacrylate-based Composite Resin Restorations: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.supervisorPournaghi Azar, Fatemeh
dc.contributor.supervisorAlizadeh Oskoee, Parnian
dc.identifier.docno603825en_US
dc.identifier.callno67746en_US
dc.contributor.departmentOperative dentistryen_US
dc.description.disciplinedentistryen_US
dc.description.degreeDDsen_US
dc.citation.reviewerNikniaz, Leila
dc.citation.reviewerKouhsoltani, Maryam
dc.citation.reviewerJafari, Elmira
dc.citation.reviewerNagahdari, Ramin
dc.citation.reviewerDibazar, Sana


فایلهای درون آیتم

Thumbnail

این آیتم در مجموعه های زیر مشاهده می شود

نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم