dc.contributor.author | Bagherpour, Mahdie | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-18T06:55:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-18T06:55:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/66767 | |
dc.description.abstract | There are different methods for termination of pregnancy, each of which has its own complications. Mechanical methods and pharmacological methods have been used to induce labor alone and have no unacceptable side effects. Given that not much study has been done on the combination of these two methods in induction of labor, therefore in this study to "compare the effect [misoprostol and cervical catheter] with [induction with oxytocin and cervical catheter] in cervical rip and induction "Childbirth" is paid.
Materials and Methods: In this study, 50 pregnant women who had referred to Taleghani and Al-Zahra hospitals in Tabriz, after examination by a specialist, were randomly divided into two groups of 25 and two methods of induction of labor entitled [Group One: Misoprostol + cervical catheter] and [group two: oxytocin + cervical catheter] were used in the hospital on pregnant women and in order to compare the effect of the two methods in induction of labor, 18 parameters and variables (7 common parameters and 11 variables with Comparative objective) was collected and analyzed as study data.
Results: Based on the data obtained from the questionnaires and data analysis, 7 common parameters [1- maternal age 2- gestational age 3- BMI 4- mean primary TV 5- infant weight 6- mean misoprostol 7- induction] They have no effect on the results of the study. Regarding 11 variables with comparative purpose, regarding a row of comparative variables [1- postpartum fever] according to the same result in two groups can not be definitively commented and in 10 other comparative variables [1- TV Primary after catheter removal 2- Average duration of catheter removal 3- Average duration of latent phase 4- Average duration of active phase 5- Average duration of second stage of delivery 6- Number of cesarean deliveries - normal (number - percentage) Number of hemoglobin drop after delivery 8- Number of blood transfusion units 9- Average number of days of hospitalization after delivery 10- Average duration of intervention until delivery], [group one: induction of delivery by misoprostol + cervical catheter] more favorable result compared to [group Second: induction of labor by oxytocin + cervical catheter]. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | fa | en_US |
dc.publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | http://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/66766 | en_US |
dc.subject | Termination of pregnancy | en_US |
dc.subject | Cervical stimulation | en_US |
dc.subject | Isoprostol + Cervical catheter | en_US |
dc.subject | Oxytocin + Cervical catheter | en_US |
dc.subject | Induction of labor | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of the effect of misoprostal and cervical catheter whit oxytocin and cervical catheter in induction of laber a clinical trinl | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.supervisor | Navali, Nazli | |
dc.identifier.docno | 6010404 | en_US |
dc.identifier.callno | 10404 | en_US |
dc.description.discipline | Obstetrics and Gynecology | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Specialty Degree | en_US |