| dc.description.abstract | In my opinion, combined with minimally invasive surgery with a more favorable and less invasive anesthesia method, more laparoscopic advantage has been made for faster recovery. Therefore, we decided to study this interventional intervention in the future concern, adequacy, safety and feasibility of spinal block for laparoscopic surgery to diagnose women in comparison with general anesthesia.
Materials & Methods: This study is performed as a future bachelor of attitudes and one-blind random sampling on a sample of 74 women aged 18-60 years who are candidates for laparoscopic gynecological surgery in two groups of 37 people under the influence of spinal anesthesia and anesthesia. Hemodynamics, respiratory parameters, pain sensation, patient and surgeon satisfaction, sedation and complications during and after surgery in the basics when continuously measured and compared between the two groups.
Results: This study in two groups of 37 patients caused a significant difference between the two groups in terms of age (p = 0.55) height (p = 0.26) weight (p = 0.27) duration of operation (p = 0.67) and length The duration of anesthesia (0.67) after surgery in the anesthesia group was not significantly increased in the anesthesia group (p <0.05). Among the complications during shoulder surgery in the anesthesia group in the form of l elemental, the highest budget. (P = 0.04) However, in the case of postoperative complications, restlessness (p = 0.00), nausea and pressure (0.00) and abdominal pain, PACU (p <0.05), frequent use of the drug (p = 0.01) in the anesthesia group significantly increased the budget. Frequency of complete satisfaction in the group affected by spinal anesthesia 91.9 and in the anesthesia group 27. Budget. In general, the average degree of satisfaction in the spinal anesthesia group gives a significantly higher gap than the budget anesthesia group. Surgeons in both groups complete complete satisfaction | en_US |
