نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم

dc.contributor.advisorGhojazadeh, Morteza
dc.contributor.authorSallakh Niknazhad, Akram
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-14T05:17:05Z
dc.date.available2021-02-14T05:17:05Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir/xmlui/handle/123456789/63633
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Introduction: Recent advances intensive neonatal cares and improved survival of preterm infants, beneficial effects of trophic feeding and limited data on timing of enteral feeding for VLBW (very low birth weight) preterm infants needs more researches to determine the optimal starting time and increasing pattern. This study aims to compare crucial neonatal outcomes of early (<48 h) versus late (>72h) trophic feeding. Aims: Main outcomes were comparing duration of intravenous feeding, time to regain birth weight, feeding tolerance and duration of hospital stay in early and late trophic groups. Methods: In a prospective cohort study, a total of 170 preterm infant ((1000 -1500gr, 26-31 week without congenital birth defect): 125 in early group (receiving trophic feeding internally within first 48 hours of birth) and 45 in late group) randomly entered the study. Infants were daily followed up for main outcomes until discharge. Results: There were no statistically significant difference in the clinical and maternal characteristics of infants in two groups. The time to gain birth weight (13.75±5.21 vs 20.53±6.31 (p<0.0005)), duration of parenteral nutrition (9.26±4.57 days vs 14.11±6.41 days (p<0.0005)), hospital stay (12.14±8.61 vs 21.11±1.14 (p<0.00005)) and time to tolerate total enteral feeding (10.31±4.25 vs 13.20±7.11 (p=0.01)) were significantly shorter in early comparing to late feeding group; late group did not experience a higher incidence of late onset sepsis 5.2% vs 4.4% (p=0.73). There was 1 cases of confirmed NEC in every group through the difference was no significant. Conclusion: The benefits of early trophic feeding shown by this study strongly support its use for the preterm infants without additional complications. However, there is need for more comprehensive studies considering crucial clinical outcomes to determine if trophic feeding can be initiated in early time to improve survival and decrease severe morbidities.en_US
dc.language.isofaen_US
dc.publisherTabriz University of Medical Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwiferyen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/31622en_US
dc.subjectKeywords: Outcome, Early trophic feeding, Late trophic feeding, Very low birth weight.en_US
dc.titleComparing Outcome of Early Versus Late Trophic Feeding in VLBW Preterm Infants Hospitalized in Al –Zahra NICU.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.supervisorSattarzadeh Jahdi, Niloofar
dc.contributor.supervisorBashar Hashemi, Fazileh
dc.identifier.docno235en_US
dc.identifier.callnoپ235en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMidwiferyen_US
dc.description.disciplineMidwifery: Maternal-Child Healthen_US
dc.description.degreeM.Sc degreeen_US


فایلهای درون آیتم

فایلهاسایزفرمتنمایش

هیچ فایل مرتبطی وجود ندارد

این آیتم در مجموعه های زیر مشاهده می شود

نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم