نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم

dc.contributor.advisorBarzegar Alamdari, Ali
dc.contributor.authorNateghi, Mehrdad
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-23T10:45:00Z
dc.date.available2020-02-23T10:45:00Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/61630
dc.description.abstractHistory and goal: One of the most common problems of implant impression making with impression copings is the possibility of their movements in the impression material. Splinting techniques and time of splinting are important factors in overcoming the polymerization shrinkage and increasing the accuracy of implant impression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of different splint methods for implant making at different times. Materials and methods: In this experimental in vitro study, using a 2-piece index of metal and acrylic model illustrator of the patient's jaw with 2 implant analogues embeded, splints of impression copings were made of autopolymerized acrylic resin (GC Pattern Resin LS, GC America Inc , USA) at different times and Open Tray impression approach was performed. From acrylic model , 36 casts were fabricated .After scanning the casts, we compared the impression accuracy in 3 groups by measuring the distance between the outer portions of the scan bodies screwed on implant analogues inside the cast coordinate software Exocad©: 1- Splinting Impression Copings with autopolymerized acrylic resin and impression making immediately after seting time (4 minutes) 2- Splinted and impression procedure have done after 17 minutes with splint section and reconnection. 3- Splint was sectioned and reconnected after 24 hours, then impression was made. The results were analyzed by SPSS 17 software and Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: The mean distance measured in impression group 1 was 19.14 ± 0.029 mm, which was significantly less than the main model. In groups two and three were 19.15 ± 0.039 and 19.159 ± 0.033 mm, respectively, which were not significantly different from the main model. The mean distance measured in 3 impression technique was similar. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the accuracy of impression making in the three splint methods at different times.en_US
dc.language.isofaen_US
dc.publisherTabriz university of medical sciencesen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/61629
dc.subjectDental implants – Implant impression - Splinten_US
dc.titleAccuracy of different splint methods for implant impression making at different timesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.supervisorNegahdari, Ramin
dc.identifier.docno603299en_US
dc.identifier.callno61585en_US
dc.contributor.departmentProsthodonticsen_US
dc.description.disciplineDentistryen_US
dc.description.degreeDDSen_US
dc.citation.reviewerGhaffari, Tahereh
dc.citation.reviewerTaghizadeh, Mahsa
dc.citation.reviewerPornasrollah, Alireza
dc.citation.reviewerBabalo, Amir reza
dc.citation.reviewerGhasemi, Shima


فایلهای درون آیتم

Thumbnail

این آیتم در مجموعه های زیر مشاهده می شود

نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم