Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJavadrashid, R
dc.contributor.authorGolamian, M
dc.contributor.authorShahrzad, M
dc.contributor.authorHajalioghli, P
dc.contributor.authorShahmorady, Z
dc.contributor.authorFouladi, DF
dc.contributor.authorSadrarhami, S
dc.contributor.authorAkhoundzadeh, L
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T09:45:05Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T09:45:05Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/58711
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: The study sought to compare the usefulness of 4 imaging modalities in visualizing various intraorbital foreign bodies (IOFBs) in different sizes. METHODS: Six different materials including metal, wood, plastic, stone, glass. and graphite were cut in cylindrical shapes in 4 sizes (dimensions: 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 mm) and placed intraorbitally in the extraocular space of fresh sheep's head. Four skilled radiologists rated the visibility of the objects individually using plain radiography, spiral computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in accordance with a previously described grading system. RESULTS: Excluding wood, all embedded foreign bodies were best visualized in CT and CBCT images with almost equal accuracies. Wood could only be detected using MRI, and then only when fragments were more than 2 mm in size. There were 3 false-positive MRI reports, suggesting air bubbles as wood IOFBs. CONCLUSIONS: Because of lower cost and using less radiation in comparison with conventional CT, CBCT can be used as the initial imaging technique in cases with suspected IOFBs. Optimal imaging technique for wood IOFBs is yet to be defined.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofCanadian Association of Radiologists Journal
dc.subjectglass
dc.subjectgraphite
dc.subjectmetal
dc.subjectplastic
dc.subjectanimal tissue
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcomputed tomography scanner
dc.subjectcone beam computed tomography
dc.subjectcone beam computed tomography scanner
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdiagnostic accuracy
dc.subjectdiagnostic test accuracy study
dc.subjectfalse positive result
dc.subjectin vitro study
dc.subjectintermethod comparison
dc.subjectintraocular foreign body
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectnuclear magnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectnuclear magnetic resonance scanner
dc.subjectradiography
dc.subjectscoring system
dc.subjectspiral computer assisted tomography
dc.subjectvisibility
dc.subjectwood
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcone beam computed tomography
dc.subjectdiagnostic imaging
dc.subjectforeign body
dc.subjectorbit
dc.subjectsheep
dc.subjectx-ray computed tomography
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectCone-Beam Computed Tomography
dc.subjectForeign Bodies
dc.subjectIn Vitro Techniques
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subjectOrbit
dc.subjectRadiography
dc.subjectSheep
dc.subjectTomography, X-Ray Computed
dc.titleVisibility of Different Intraorbital Foreign Bodies Using Plain Radiography, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume68
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage194
dc.citation.epage201
dc.citation.indexScopus
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2015.09.011


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record