Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRahmati, A
dc.contributor.authorGal, M
dc.contributor.authorNorthey, G
dc.contributor.authorBrazier, JS
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T09:36:52Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T09:36:52Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/58032
dc.description.abstractFifty isolates of the most common UK strain of Clostridium difficile [polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotype 001] were analysed by three PCR-based typing methods in order to determine genomic diversity within this strain that may form the basis of a subtyping method. The three methods used were repetitive extragenic palindromic elements (REP), conserved repetitive DNA elements (BOX), and enterobacterial repetitive PCR intergenic consensus sequences (ERIC). The performance of each typing method was assessed by comparing powers of discrimination, typeability and reproducibility. All methods had satisfactory levels of typeability and reproducibility as determined by blind-coded repeats, but REP-PCR typing proved to be the most discriminatory method, yielding seven distinct amplicon profiles consisting of up to eight major bands. BOX-PCR generated between two and five major amplicons with four distinct BOX profiles. ERIC-PCR primers, however, could not discriminate between isolates. These results suggest that PCR ribotype 001 is not clonal in nature at present, and that REP-PCR subtyping methods offer promise to further our understanding of the epidemiology of C. difficile PCR ribotype 001 disease in UK hospitals. ط¢آ© 2004 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Hospital Infection
dc.subjectbacterial DNA
dc.subjectrepetitive DNA
dc.subjectamplicon
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectbacterial strain
dc.subjectbacterium culture
dc.subjectbacterium identification
dc.subjectbacterium isolation
dc.subjectClostridium difficile
dc.subjectconsensus sequence
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectDNA extraction
dc.subjectDNA fingerprinting
dc.subjectEnterobacter
dc.subjectgenetic variability
dc.subjectmolecular cloning
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectpolymerase chain reaction
dc.subjectreproducibility
dc.subjectribotyping
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom
dc.subjectBelgium
dc.subjectClostridium difficile
dc.subjectClostridium Infections
dc.subjectConsensus Sequence
dc.subjectDiscriminant Analysis
dc.subjectDNA Fingerprinting
dc.subjectDNA, Bacterial
dc.subjectDNA, Intergenic
dc.subjectElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field
dc.subjectGenome, Bacterial
dc.subjectGenotype
dc.subjectGreat Britain
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInfection Control
dc.subjectNorthern Ireland
dc.subjectPolymerase Chain Reaction
dc.subjectRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid
dc.subjectRibotyping
dc.subjectSingle-Blind Method
dc.subjectSpecies Specificity
dc.subjectVariation (Genetics)
dc.titleSubtyping of Clostridium difficile polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotype 001 by repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR genomic fingerprinting
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume60
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage56
dc.citation.epage60
dc.citation.indexScopus
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2004.09.034


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record