Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMotavalli, LR
dc.contributor.authorHoseinian Azghadi, E
dc.contributor.authorMiri Hakimabad, H
dc.contributor.authorAkhlaghi, P
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T09:33:07Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T09:33:07Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/57491
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to provide updated radiation dose from diagnostic exams performed for pregnant patients suspected of pulmonary embolism (PE) using the recently developed BREP phantoms of pregnant woman and the fetus. Also to challenge the validity of current recommendations suggest that ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) vs. computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) should be considered for diagnosis of PE in radiosensitive groups such as pregnant women. Methods: The Monte Carlo calculations involving detailed geometrical simulation of pregnant women and the fetus were performed. Results: The results showed that when radiation dose to the fetus is of concern, CTPA is more appropriate at early stages causes 50%-97% lower fetal doses for the first two trimesters of pregnancy. While for gestational periods more than 6 months, V/Q SPECT leads to a 15% lower fetal dose and thus, is less hazardous. The fetal dose from CTPA increases with gestational age, while that from V/Q SPECT decreases. Furthermore, the maximum amount of fetal dose is received by fetal skeleton (i.e., on average about 1.8 and 3.9 times larger dose from SPECT and CT, respectively). Conclusions: V/Q SPECT should not always be preferred for pregnant patients suspected of PE. This finding is in contrast with the guidance to choose the preferred modality based on the maternal effective dose. The reason of this issue was discussed in this paper based on chord length distributions (CLDs). The importance of considering fetal organs separately in MC calculations was also highlighted. é 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Physics
dc.subjectpentetate technetium tc 99m
dc.subjecttechnetium 99m
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcomputed tomographic angiography
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdiagnostic imaging
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfetus
dc.subjectfirst trimester pregnancy
dc.subjectgestation period
dc.subjectgestational age
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectlung angiography
dc.subjectlung embolism
dc.subjectlung perfusion
dc.subjectlung ventilation
dc.subjectMonte Carlo method
dc.subjectpregnancy
dc.subjectpregnant woman
dc.subjectradiation dose
dc.subjectsecond trimester pregnancy
dc.subjectsingle photon emission computed tomography
dc.subjectskeleton
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectcomputed tomographic angiography
dc.subjectdevices
dc.subjectdiagnostic imaging
dc.subjectimaging phantom
dc.subjectlung
dc.subjectlung embolism
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectpregnancy
dc.subjectpregnancy complication
dc.subjectradiation response
dc.subjectsingle photon emission computed tomography
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectComputed Tomography Angiography
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFetus
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLung
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectPhantoms, Imaging
dc.subjectPregnancy
dc.subjectPregnancy Complications
dc.subjectPulmonary Embolism
dc.subjectRadiation Dosage
dc.subjectTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
dc.titlePulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: Assessing organ dose to pregnant phantom and its fetus during lung imaging: Assessing
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume44
dc.citation.issue11
dc.citation.spage6038
dc.citation.epage6046
dc.citation.indexScopus
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12558


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record