dc.contributor.author | Fouladi, RF | |
dc.contributor.author | Navali, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Abbassi, A | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-26T09:32:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-26T09:32:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier | 10.3109/01443615.2012.719945 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/57298 | |
dc.description.abstract | The objective of this study was to compare maternal and fetal outcomes in caesarean deliveries received pre-incisional, post-incisional or combined pre-and post-incisional local wound infiltrations with lidocaine. In a randomised, double-blind clinical trial, candidates of elective caesarean section received local wound infiltration with an anaesthetic mixture including 1% lidocaine pre-incisionally (n = 94), post-incisionally (n = 92) or both (n = 95). Postoperative pain, duration of analgesia, number of postoperative rescue analgesic demands, time to ambulation, time of first breast-feeding and neonatal Apgar score were compared. Main outcome variables were comparable between the pre-and post-incisional groups. Pain scores and duration of analgesia were significantly lower in the mixed group. Time of breast-feeding and number of analgesic demand were significantly lower in 'mixed' group than those in pre-and post-incisional groups, respectively. The other variables were comparable. Combined pre-and post-incisional local wound infiltration in post-caesarean pain relief is superior to each one alone. © 2013 Informa UK, Ltd. | |
dc.language.iso | English | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | |
dc.subject | adrenalin plus lidocaine | |
dc.subject | anesthetic agent | |
dc.subject | antibiotic agent | |
dc.subject | diclofenac | |
dc.subject | ephedrine | |
dc.subject | midazolam | |
dc.subject | morphine | |
dc.subject | antibiotic therapy | |
dc.subject | Apgar score | |
dc.subject | article | |
dc.subject | breast feeding | |
dc.subject | cesarean section | |
dc.subject | controlled study | |
dc.subject | double blind procedure | |
dc.subject | elective surgery | |
dc.subject | female | |
dc.subject | human | |
dc.subject | incision | |
dc.subject | local anesthesia | |
dc.subject | mobilization | |
dc.subject | outcome assessment | |
dc.subject | pain assessment | |
dc.subject | postoperative analgesia | |
dc.subject | postoperative pain | |
dc.subject | pregnancy outcome | |
dc.subject | pregnant woman | |
dc.subject | priority journal | |
dc.subject | randomized controlled trial | |
dc.subject | spinal anesthesia | |
dc.subject | surgical infection | |
dc.subject | visual analog scale | |
dc.subject | wound healing impairment | |
dc.subject | Adult | |
dc.subject | Analgesia | |
dc.subject | Anesthetics, Local | |
dc.subject | Cesarean Section | |
dc.subject | Double-Blind Method | |
dc.subject | Female | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Infant | |
dc.subject | Lidocaine | |
dc.subject | Pain, Postoperative | |
dc.subject | Pregnancy | |
dc.subject | Surgical Procedures, Elective | |
dc.subject | Young Adult | |
dc.title | Pre-incisional, post-incisional and combined pre-and post-incisional local wound infiltrations with lidocaine in elective caesarean section delivery: A randomised clinical trial | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.citation.volume | 33 | |
dc.citation.issue | 1 | |
dc.citation.spage | 54 | |
dc.citation.epage | 59 | |
dc.citation.index | Scopus | |
dc.identifier.DOI | https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2012.719945 | |