Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGhaffari, A
dc.contributor.authorShoja, MM
dc.contributor.authorTubbs, RS
dc.contributor.authorLoukas, M
dc.contributor.authorAgutter, PS
dc.contributor.authorGhabili, K
dc.contributor.authorEtemadi, J
dc.contributor.authorCohen-Gadol, AA
dc.contributor.authorWeiner, BK
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T09:31:40Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T09:31:40Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/57133
dc.description.abstractThe philosophy of science in general, and the philosophy of biology in particular, arerelevant to scientific medicine. However, contemporary medical understanding raisesdistinct and perhaps unique ontological and epistemological issues that merit separate consideration, not least because they can have implications for practice. In this paper, weidentify some of these issues, using the current controversy surrounding the treatment ofanemia in cases of chronic kidney disease as exemplar. The preliminary inferences drawnfrom this discussion are presented as starting points for more detailed exploration byphilosophers, as well as matters for attention by clinicians. © 2013 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofHypotheses in Clinical Medicine
dc.titleParadigm shifts and explanation in clinical medicine: The "how" of reality and the "why" of truth
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.spage9
dc.citation.epage18
dc.citation.indexScopus


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record