Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoosavi, H
dc.contributor.authorMaleknejad, F
dc.contributor.authorKimyai, S
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T08:55:45Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T08:55:45Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/54348
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated anterior teeth with their roots reinforced using three different restorative methods. Methods and Materials: Forty sound maxillary human central incisors were randomly assigned to four groups (n=10). The crowns of the teeth were removed at a level 2 mm incisal to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). After root canal therapy, flared canals were simulated in three groups. In the first, second, and third groups the flared canals were reinforced with resin composite (RCO) (Clearfil DC Core Automix), two Reforpins (REF), and a resin cement (RCE) (Panavia F 2.0), respectively. In the fourth (DEN) group flared canals were not created. The same size fiber reinforced composite (FRC) posts were cemented with resin cement (Panavia F 2.0) in all groups. After post cementation and restoration of the teeth crown with a core build-up composite (Clearfil Photo Core), the roots of the teeth were embedded in acrylic resin blocks up to 1 mm below the CEJ. The samples were loaded in an Instron testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min at a 45آ° angle to the long axis of the tooth on the palatal surfaces until failure occurred. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-square tests (p=0.05). Results: Significant differences were found between fracture resistance in all of the groups (P<0.05) with the exception being among the RCO and REF groups. The least mean value 230 (130) N and the highest mean value 830 (220) N were shown in the fracture resistance of the RCE and DEN groups, respectively. Conclusion: Reforpin can be used as an alternative to resin composite for internal reinforcement of weakened roots according to the results of this study. For reinforcement of flared canals, fiber posts along with Reforpin or resin composite proved to have higher fracture resistance than resin cement. Non flared canals had the highest fracture resistance.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Contemporary Dental Practice
dc.subjectroot canal filling material
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectchemistry
dc.subjectchi square distribution
dc.subjectclinical trial
dc.subjectcontrolled clinical trial
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdental care
dc.subjectdental surgery
dc.subjecthistology
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectnonparametric test
dc.subjectradiography
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.subjecttooth crown
dc.subjecttooth fracture
dc.subjecttooth pulp disease
dc.subjecttooth root
dc.subjectChi-Square Distribution
dc.subjectDental Restoration Failure
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPost and Core Technique
dc.subjectRoot Canal Filling Materials
dc.subjectStatistics, Nonparametric
dc.subjectTooth Fractures
dc.subjectTooth Root
dc.subjectTooth, Nonvital
dc.titleFracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth restored using three root-reinforcement methods
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume9
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage30
dc.citation.epage37
dc.citation.indexScopus


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record