Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMehnati, P
dc.contributor.authorAmirnia, A
dc.contributor.authorJabbari, N
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T08:54:06Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T08:54:06Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/54077
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The biological effects of ionizing radiation (BEIR VII) report estimates that the risk of getting cancer from radiation is increased by about a third from current regulation risk levels. The propose of this study was to estimate cancer induction risk from abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scanning of adult patients using 6- and 16-slice CT scanners. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study on 200 patients with abdominopelvic CT scan in 6- and 16-slice scanners was conducted. The dose-length product (DLP) and volume CT Dose Index (CTDIvol) values from the scanners as well as the effective dose values from the ImPACT CT patient dosimetry calculator with the biological effects of ionizing radiation (BEIR VII) method were used to estimate the cancer induction risk. Results: The mean (and standard deviation) values of CTDIvol and DLP were 6.9 (آ±1.07) mGy and 306.44 (آ± 60.57) mGy.cm for 6-slice, and 5.19 (آ±0.91) mGy and 219.7 (آ±49.31) mGy.cm for 16-slice scanner, respectively. The range of effective dose in the 6-slice scanner was 2.61-8.15 mSv and, in the 16-slice scanner, it was 1.47-4.72 mSv. The mean and standard deviation values of total cancer induction risk in abdominopelvic examinations were 0.136 آ± 0.059% for men and 0.135 آ± 0.063% for women in the 6-slice CT scanner. The values were 0.126 آ± 0.051% for men and 0.127 آ± 0.056% for women in the 16-slice scanner. Conclusions: The cancer induction risk of abdominopelvic scanning was noticeable. Therefore, radiation dose should be minimized by optimizing the protocols and applying appropriate methods. é 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Radiation Biology
dc.subjectabdominal radiography
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectage
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbladder cancer
dc.subjectbody mass
dc.subjectcancer risk
dc.subjectcolon cancer
dc.subjectcomputed tomography scanner
dc.subjectcomputer assisted tomography
dc.subjectcross-sectional study
dc.subjectcurve fitting
dc.subjectdosimeter
dc.subjectdosimetry
dc.subjecteffective dose (radiation)
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthigh risk patient
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectionizing radiation
dc.subjectliver cancer
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectorgans at risk
dc.subjectovary cancer
dc.subjectpelvis radiography
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectprostate cancer
dc.subjectradiation carcinogenesis
dc.subjectradiation dose
dc.subjectradiation exposure
dc.subjectradiation hazard
dc.subjectradiation induced neoplasm
dc.subjectrisk factor
dc.subjectsex
dc.subjectstomach cancer
dc.subjectuterus cancer
dc.subjectvolume ct dose index
dc.subjectabdominal radiography
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectage distribution
dc.subjectdiagnostic imaging
dc.subjectincidence
dc.subjectIran
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectmultidetector computed tomography
dc.subjectNeoplasms, Radiation-Induced
dc.subjectpelvis
dc.subjectradiation response
dc.subjectradiotherapy dosage
dc.subjectsex ratio
dc.subjectstatistics and numerical data
dc.subjectutilization
dc.subjectvery elderly
dc.subjectyoung adult
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAge Distribution
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIncidence
dc.subjectIran
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMultidetector Computed Tomography
dc.subjectNeoplasms, Radiation-Induced
dc.subjectPelvis
dc.subjectRadiation Exposure
dc.subjectRadiography, Abdominal
dc.subjectRadiotherapy Dosage
dc.subjectRisk Factors
dc.subjectSex Distribution
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.titleEstimating cancer induction risk from abdominopelvic scanning with 6- and 16-slice computed tomography
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume93
dc.citation.issue4
dc.citation.spage416
dc.citation.epage425
dc.citation.indexScopus
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2017.1268280


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record