Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVahedi, A
dc.contributor.authorDianat, I
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T08:53:40Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T08:53:40Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/53997
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aims of this study were to evaluate the employees' subjective assessments of different aspects of lighting condition as well as task area illuminance in manufacturing plants. Methods: This field study was conducted between March and May 2013, in three packing plants (Saveh, central Iran). Data were collected by questionnaire and measurement of the task area illuminance levels. Data were analysed using contingency coefficient test, Spearman's correlation analysis and non-parametric Friedman tests. Results: The recommended illuminance levels were not met in 46.9% of the work areas. This finding was in agreement with the employees' perception of light level, and with low satisfaction with lighting in the work environment. Adverse effects of lighting condition on job performance, changing posture for better viewing of the work area and eye tiredness were reported as 64%, 33% and 31% of the employees, respectively. Satisfaction with lighting was negatively correlated with the age of respondents (r=-0.229; P<0.010). The employees' satisfaction with lighting was also highly correlated with the employees' subjective assessments of the light level (r=0.779; P<0.001), type of artificial light sources (r=0.591; P<0.001), light colour (r=0.50; P<0.001) and use of daylight (r=0.254; P<0.004). The type of artificial light sources was correlated with job performance (r=0.311, P<0.001) and eye tiredness (r=0.273; P<0.002). Conclusions: The findings highlight the potential usefulness of subjective assessments to supplement objective measures and provide a more holistic approach to lighting design and planning.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Research in Health Sciences
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectage
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectbody posture
dc.subjectcontingency coefficient test
dc.subjectcorrelation analysis
dc.subjectcorrelation coefficient
dc.subjectdata processing
dc.subjectemployee
dc.subjectfield study
dc.subjectFriedman test
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectillumination
dc.subjectindustry
dc.subjectIran
dc.subjectjob performance
dc.subjectjob satisfaction
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmanufacturing plant
dc.subjectnormal human
dc.subjectperception
dc.subjectquestionnaire
dc.subjectstatistical analysis
dc.subjectvisual stress
dc.subjectwork environment
dc.subjectadverse effects
dc.subjectasthenopia
dc.subjectillumination
dc.subjectlight
dc.subjectmanufacturing industry
dc.subjectstandards
dc.subjecttask performance
dc.subjectworkplace
dc.subjectyoung adult
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAge Factors
dc.subjectAsthenopia
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIran
dc.subjectJob Satisfaction
dc.subjectLight
dc.subjectLighting
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectManufacturing Industry
dc.subjectPerception
dc.subjectPosture
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subjectTask Performance and Analysis
dc.subjectWorkplace
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.titleEmployees' perception of lighting conditions in manufacturing plants: Associations with illuminance measurements
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume14
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage40
dc.citation.epage45
dc.citation.indexScopus


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record