Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSayyah-Melli, M
dc.contributor.authorZonoozi, GK
dc.contributor.authorHashemzadeh, S
dc.contributor.authorEsfahani, A
dc.contributor.authorOuladehsahebmadarek, E
dc.contributor.authorShobeiry, MJ
dc.contributor.authorGarabaghi, PM
dc.contributor.authorRamin, A
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T08:51:00Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T08:51:00Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/53181
dc.description.abstractPurpose Ovarian cancer is the sixth common cancer in women in developed countries. In severe cases, the optimal debulking is necessary. In order to increase optimal debulking and reduce preoperative complications, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by debulking surgery, and then chemotherapy again is introduced as substitute for primary surgery. In this study, we aim to evaluate perioperative outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin/ paclyaxol in comparison with primary cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Methods In this prospective study, 60 patients with advanced ovarian cancer due to the disease severity were assigned into neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 30) or control (n = 30) groups. In neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, patients received three cycles of carboplatin (5-6 area under the curve) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) preoperatively followed by interval surgery. The control group received primary surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy. Preoperative outcome was compared between groups. Results Neoadjuvant group had significantly lower mean levels of CA 125 (p = 0.01) and less severe bleeding (p = 0.03) than control group. There was no significant difference between surgery time, preoperative complications, residual mass less than 1 cm, and hospital stay between groups. There was no mortality during the study. Conclusion Neoadjuvant chemotherapy caused less severe bleeding, but has no effect in decreasing complications after surgery; however, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery was not superior to primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy as a treatment option for patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma in this study. é Federation of Obstetric and Gynecological Societies of India 2013.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India
dc.subjectCA 125 antigen
dc.subjectcarboplatin
dc.subjectpaclitaxel
dc.subjectabdominal hysterectomy
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectadvanced cancer
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectcancer adjuvant therapy
dc.subjectcancer patient
dc.subjectcancer staging
dc.subjectcancer surgery
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectcohort analysis
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectconsolidation chemotherapy
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectcytoreductive surgery
dc.subjectdisease severity
dc.subjectevaluation study
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectlymph node dissection
dc.subjectmultiple cycle treatment
dc.subjectomentectomy
dc.subjectoutcome assessment
dc.subjectovary cancer
dc.subjectparaaortic lymph node
dc.subjectperioperative period
dc.subjectperitoneum tumor
dc.subjectpostoperative complication
dc.subjectpostoperative ileus
dc.subjectpostoperative nausea
dc.subjectpostoperative period
dc.subjectpostoperative vomiting
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectprospective study
dc.subjectprotein blood level
dc.subjectsalpingooophorectomy
dc.subjectsurgical infection
dc.subjectyoung adult
dc.titleComparison of platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume63
dc.citation.issue6
dc.citation.spage405
dc.citation.epage409
dc.citation.indexScopus
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-013-0425-z


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record