Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFekrazad, R
dc.contributor.authorPoorsattar Bejeh Mir, A
dc.contributor.authorKahyaie Aghdam, M
dc.contributor.authorGhasemi Barghi, V
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T08:51:00Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T08:51:00Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/53179
dc.description.abstractBackground Superficial mycotic skin infections which are predominantly caused by Trichophyton rubrum, poorly responsd to conventional therapies. A great amount of attention has focused on finding more effective treatments. The current work is aimed to compare the effectiveness of phoinactivation of Trichophyton rubrum by two relatively new photosensitizers: a phenothiazinium dye(New methylene blue) and Indocyanine green (EmunDo®). Materials and methods A Final inoculum of T. rubrum which corresponded to 106 colony forming unit per milliliter (CFUآ ml?1) was prepared. Antimicrobial Photodynamic treatment (aPDT) of T. rubrum was carried out by either EmunDo® (1آ mg/ml, Infra-red laser (IRL, ?آ =آ 810آ nm, Energy Density 55آ J/cm2)) or NMB (10آ ?M, Red laser (RL), ?آ =آ 630آ nm, Energy Density of 5آ J/cm2). The suspensions thereafter were subcultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) and were counted on due time. based on colony-forming unit per milliliter (CFU/ml). Results aPDT with either EmunDo® (E) or NMB (N) considerably diminished the viability of inoculated T. rubrum with respective reduction of 0.64 log and 0.4 log compared to the control group (Pآ <آ 0.001). No significant difference was found between two laser only groups (Pآ =آ 0.79) and two aPDT groups (Pآ =آ 0.73), however significant reduction of T. rubrum in red laser only group (Pآ =آ 0.04) and EmunDo® only group (Pآ =آ 0.04) was found as compared to the control group (Pآ <آ 0.05). Conclusion The study provides evidence regarding satisfactory photodynamic inactivation of T. rubrum with EmunDo® or NMB as photosensitizers. Irradiation by only red laser source was found superior to only infra-red laser source. Dark toxicity of EmunDo® was more successful than new methylene blue dye. é 2017
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofPhotodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
dc.subjectdistilled water
dc.subjectindocyanine green
dc.subjectmethylene blue
dc.subjectindocyanine green
dc.subjectmethylene blue
dc.subjectphotosensitizing agent
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcell viability
dc.subjectcolony forming unit
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectfungal cell
dc.subjectfungal viability
dc.subjectgene inactivation
dc.subjectlaser
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectorganism colony
dc.subjectphotoactivation
dc.subjectphotodynamic therapy
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectreduction (chemistry)
dc.subjectsuspension
dc.subjectTrichophyton rubrum
dc.subjectcell survival
dc.subjectdisinfection
dc.subjectdose response
dc.subjectdrug effects
dc.subjectphotochemotherapy
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectradiation dose
dc.subjectradiation response
dc.subjecttreatment outcome
dc.subjectTrichophyton
dc.subjectCell Survival
dc.subjectDisinfection
dc.subjectDose-Response Relationship, Drug
dc.subjectDose-Response Relationship, Radiation
dc.subjectIndocyanine Green
dc.subjectMethylene Blue
dc.subjectPhotochemotherapy
dc.subjectPhotosensitizing Agents
dc.subjectRadiation Dosage
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectTrichophyton
dc.titleComparison of photoinactivation of T. rubrum by new methylene blue (NMB) and indocyanine green (EmunDo®)
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.citation.volume18
dc.citation.spage208
dc.citation.epage212
dc.citation.indexScopus
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.10.013


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record