Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAhoor, MH
dc.contributor.authorSorkhabi, R
dc.contributor.authorMilani, AE
dc.contributor.authorKaleibar, SA
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T08:50:59Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T08:50:59Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/53171
dc.description.abstractAIM: To compare one step macular hole and cataract surgery with two step surgery in patients with macular hole and cataract. METHODS: In a clinical trial conducted on patients suffering from cataract with macular holes inTabriz, the effects of simultaneous surgery of macular hole and cataract performed on these patients were studied. In this study, 22 patients (Group A) were, first, undergone phacoemulsification and intraocular lens embedment, and one month later, 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy together with the retinal internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal. Twenty-one patients (Group B) were undergone simultaneous phacoemulsification, intraocular lens embedment, 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy, and the retinal ILM removal. RESULTS: Group A was comprised of 7 males and 15 females, and Group B of 9 males and 12 females (P=0.545). The mean age of patients in Group A and B were 66.63أ¯?آ½4.75 and 67.71أ¯?آ½4.99y, respectively (P=0.472). Three months after surgeries were performed, the macular holes of 2 patients from Group A and 5 patients from Group B were open (P=0.240). Uveitis was observed in 1 patient from Group A and 4 from Group B (P=0.185). The increase of intraocular pressure (IOP) was merely observed in 2 patients from Group B (P=0.233). Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) was observed, three months after surgeries, in 2 patients from Group A and 4 from Group B (P=0.412). CONCLUSION: The results suggested that, no significant difference existed between patients from the two groups in terms of outcome and postoperative complications, although, Group B patients, the recipients of simultaneous surgeries, experienced more complications compared to their Group A counterparts. Copyright 2016 by the IJO Press.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Eye Science
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcataract
dc.subjectcataract extraction
dc.subjectciliary disk
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjecteye surgery
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectintraocular pressure
dc.subjectintraocular pressure abnormality
dc.subjectlens implantation
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectphacoemulsification
dc.subjectpostoperative complication
dc.subjectprospective study
dc.subjectretina macula hole
dc.subjectretinal internal limiting membrane removal
dc.subjecttreatment outcome
dc.subjectuveitis
dc.subjectvitrectomy
dc.titleComparison of one step macular hole and cataract surgery with two step surgery
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume16
dc.citation.issue10
dc.citation.spage1795
dc.citation.epage1799
dc.citation.indexScopus
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2016.10.03


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record