Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSohrabi, B
dc.contributor.authorJamshidi, P
dc.contributor.authorYaghoubi, A
dc.contributor.authorHabibzadeh, A
dc.contributor.authorHashemi-Aghdam, Y
dc.contributor.authorMoin, A
dc.contributor.authorKazemi, B
dc.contributor.authorGhaffari, S
dc.contributor.authorAbdolahzadeh Baghayi, MR
dc.contributor.authorMahmoody, K
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T08:40:26Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T08:40:26Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/53114
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study sought to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular treatment with covered versus bare Cheatham-platinum stents (NuMed, Hopkinton, New York) in coarctation of aorta (CoA) patients. Background: Covered stenting has been newly recognized as a useful therapeutic method for patients with native CoA, but there has been no study comparing the use of covered stents with bare stents for treating CoA. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 120 patients with a mean age of 23.60 آ± 10.99 years (range 12 to 58 years, 79 men), with post-ductal, short-segment, severe native CoA underwent implantation of bare Cheatham-Platinum (bCP) (n = 60) or covered Cheatham-Platinum (cCP) (n = 60) stents. Patients were followed clinically at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the stenting and yearly thereafter. During follow-up, multislice computed tomography (64 slices) was scheduled to assess any complications. Results: The procedural success rate was 100% in both groups. Patients were followed for 31.1 آ± 19.2 months. Although recoarctation was seen only in the bCP group during follow-up, the difference between groups did not reach statistical significance (6.7% vs. 0%; p = NS). Two cases of pseudoaneurysm (3.3%) occurred in the cCP group, but none was observed in the bCP group (p = NS). Normotensive status significantly increased during follow-up in both groups (from 15% to 73.3% in the bCP group and 16.7% to 78.3% in the cCP group, p < 0.001 for each group and not significant between groups). Conclusions: Implanting bCP and cCP stents have very high success rates with remarkable hemodynamic effects in severe native CoA patients. Patients undergoing cCP stent implantation experienced a nonsignificantly lower recoarctation rate and a higher occurrence of pseudoaneurysm formation with respect to bCP stenting during follow-up. These findings indicate that CoA stenting is a safe procedure. (Endovascular Stenting With Covered CP Stent Compared With Bare CP Stent for Adult Patients With Coarctation: The Initial and Intermediate-Term Follow-Up Results; IRCT201012045311N1). é 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
dc.subjectantihypertensive agent
dc.subjectcefazolin
dc.subjectheparin
dc.subjectbiomaterial
dc.subjectplatinum
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectaorta coarctation
dc.subjectaorta disease
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectbackache
dc.subjectballoon catheter
dc.subjectbare cheatham platinum stent
dc.subjectbare metal stent
dc.subjectbleeding
dc.subjectcatheter sheath
dc.subjectchild
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectcovered cheatham platinum stent
dc.subjectfalse aneurysm
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfollow up
dc.subjectheart catheter
dc.subjectheart hemodynamics
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjecthypertension
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmedical device complication
dc.subjectmultidetector computed tomography
dc.subjectoutcome assessment
dc.subjectparaplegia
dc.subjectpost aorta coarctation syndrome
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectrecurrent disease
dc.subjectstent dissection
dc.subjectstent malapposition
dc.subjectstent migration
dc.subjectvascular disease
dc.subjectvascular guide wire
dc.subjectvascular stent
dc.subjectAortic Coarctation
dc.subjectaortography
dc.subjectendovascular surgery
dc.subjecthemodynamics
dc.subjectIran
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectpathophysiology
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectprosthesis
dc.subjectseverity of illness index
dc.subjectstent
dc.subjecttime
dc.subjecttreatment outcome
dc.subjectyoung adult
dc.subjectaorta coarctation
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbare cheatham platinum stent
dc.subjectbare metal stent
dc.subjectbare metal stenting
dc.subjectdiastolic blood pressure
dc.subjectsystolic blood pressure
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAortic Coarctation
dc.subjectAortography
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectCoated Materials, Biocompatible
dc.subjectEndovascular Procedures
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHemodynamics
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIran
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMultidetector Computed Tomography
dc.subjectPlatinum
dc.subjectProsthesis Design
dc.subjectSeverity of Illness Index
dc.subjectStents
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.titleComparison between covered and bare Cheatham-platinum stents for endovascular treatment of patients with native post-ductal aortic coarctation: Immediate and intermediate-term results
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume7
dc.citation.issue4
dc.citation.spage416
dc.citation.epage423
dc.citation.indexScopus
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.018


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record