Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBabaie, J
dc.contributor.authorArdalan, A
dc.contributor.authorVatandoost, H
dc.contributor.authorGoya, MM
dc.contributor.authorAkbarisari, A
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T08:39:54Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T08:39:54Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/53067
dc.description.abstractObjective: One of the most important measures following disasters is setting up a communicable disease surveillance system (CDSS). This study aimed to develop indicators to assess the performance of CDSSs in disasters. Method: In this 3-phase study, firstly a qualitative study was conducted through in-depth, semistructured interviews with experts on health in disasters and emergencies, health services managers, and communicable diseases center specialists. The interviews were analyzed, and CDSS performance assessment (PA) indicators were extracted. The appropriateness of these indicators was examined through a questionnaire administered to experts and heads of communicable diseases departments of medical sciences universities. Finally, the designed indicators were weighted using the analytic hierarchy process approach and Expert Choice software. Results: In this study, 51 indicators were designed, of which 10 were related to the input (19.61%), 17 to the process (33.33%), 13 to the product (25.49%), and 11 to the outcome (21.57%). In weighting, the maximum score was that of input (49.1), and the scores of the process, product, and outcome were 31.4, 12.7, and 6.8, respectively. Conclusion: Through 3 different phases, PA indicators for 4 phases of a chain of results were developed. The authors believe that these PA indicators can assess the system's performance and its achievements in response to disasters. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;page 1 of 7) Copyright é Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2018
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofDisaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
dc.titleCommunicable Disease Surveillance Systems in Disasters: Application of the Input, Process, Product, and Outcome Framework for Performance Assessment
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.spage1
dc.citation.epage7
dc.citation.indexScopus
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2018.10


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record