Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMasoumi, H
dc.contributor.authorHasanzadeh, H
dc.contributor.authorJadidi, M
dc.contributor.authorMirmohammadkhani, M
dc.contributor.authorBitarafan-Rajabi, A
dc.contributor.authorAbedelahi, A
dc.contributor.authorEmadi, A
dc.contributor.authorBokharaeian, M
dc.contributor.authorShabani, F
dc.contributor.authorMoshfegh, S
dc.contributor.authorSeifi, D
dc.contributor.authorKhani, T
dc.contributor.authorPursamimi, M
dc.contributor.authorEhtiati, A
dc.contributor.authorVali, MH
dc.contributor.authorZiari, A
dc.contributor.authorVali, S
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T08:33:08Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T08:33:08Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/52388
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Radiation exposure during radiological examination is a health concern, of which radiology professionals should be cognizant. We sought to evaluate the radiation protection knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) amongst radiology staff of hospitals across 10 provinces of Iran. Materials and Methods: For evaluating the level of radiation protection KAP, 553 radiology staff were enrolled. A 32-item questionnaire was designed to assess radiation protection KAP, the validity which was confirmed by members of the Medical Physics and Biostatistics departments. The questionnaire evaluated the respondents' knowledge, practice, and attitudes towards the basic principles of radiation protection, the necessity of using protective equipment, and their performance in the implementation of radiation protection recommendations. Results: We found no significant difference in the level of radiation protection KAP between male and female radiology staff and among those with different educational levels and ages (P > 0.05). However, there was a significant association between radiation protection KAP and working experience, hospital size, and hospital type (P < 0.05). Further, no significant difference was observed in the radiation protection KAP level among radiology staff of different regions (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Our results showed that the level of radiation protection KAP among radiology staff is inadequate. This might be due to the lack of ongoing training courses concerning protection against ionizing radiation. Thus, sustained training of radiation protection principles can promote KAP among the staff of radiology departments, and in turn, reduce public dose from medical diagnostic modalities. é 2018, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofIranian Journal of Medical Physics
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.subjectHospitals
dc.subjectIonizing radiation
dc.subjectPersonnel training
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.subjectSurveys
dc.subjectEducational levels
dc.subjectKnowledge attitude
dc.subjectMedical diagnostics
dc.subjectMedical staffs
dc.subjectProfessional practices
dc.subjectProtection principle
dc.subjectProtective equipment
dc.subjectRadiology departments
dc.subjectRadiation protection
dc.titleA survey on the radiation protection status among radiology staff
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume15
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.spage176
dc.citation.epage181
dc.citation.indexScopus
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.22038/ijmp.2018.24725.1249


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record