Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShahi, S
dc.contributor.authorYavari, HR
dc.contributor.authorRahimi, S
dc.contributor.authorReyhani, MF
dc.contributor.authorKamarroosta, Z
dc.contributor.authorAbdolrahimi, M
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T08:32:05Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T08:32:05Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier10.2334/josnusd.51.55
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/52246
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of RaCe, FlexMaster and ProFile rotary instruments on smear layer formation by scanning electron microscopy. Eighty-four caries-free freshly extracted human single-rooted teeth were selected and divided into three groups, each containing 28 teeth. The teeth were instrumented with rotary instruments sequentially: Group A: ProFile Rotary Instruments; Group B: FlexMaster Rotary Instruments; and Group C: RaCe Rotary Instruments. Instrumentation was performed by the crown-down method and according to the manufacturer's instructions. The specimens were then examined with SEM according to Hأ¼lsmann's classification. One-way ANOVA and a post hoc Tukey test were used for statistical analysis. The results showed that there were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in the coronal third (P = 0.39), but at the apical and middle thirds there were statistically significant differences between the RaCe group and the other groups (P < 0.05). Smear layer in the RaCe group was less than that in the ProFile and FlexMaster groups, but the difference between the ProFile group and FlexMaster group was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). It was concluded that RaCe Rotary Instruments produce less smear layer than FlexMaster and ProFile Rotary Instruments.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of oral science
dc.subjectdental alloy
dc.subjectnickel
dc.subjecttitanium
dc.subjecttitanium nickelide
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectclinical trial
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcontrolled clinical trial
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdental surgery
dc.subjectdentin
dc.subjectendodontics
dc.subjectequipment design
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinstrumentation
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectrotation
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopy
dc.subjectsingle blind procedure
dc.subjectsurface property
dc.subjecttooth pulp
dc.subjecttooth root
dc.subjectultrastructure
dc.subjectDental Alloys
dc.subjectDental Pulp Cavity
dc.subjectDentin
dc.subjectEquipment Design
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning
dc.subjectNickel
dc.subjectRoot Canal Preparation
dc.subjectRotation
dc.subjectSingle-Blind Method
dc.subjectSmear Layer
dc.subjectSurface Properties
dc.subjectTitanium
dc.subjectTooth Apex
dc.titleA comparative scanning electron microscopic study of the effect of three different rotary instruments on smear layer formation.
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume51
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage55
dc.citation.epage60
dc.citation.indexScopus
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.51.55


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record