dc.contributor.author | BarzegarJalali, M | |
dc.contributor.author | JouybanGharamaleki, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Hanaee, J | |
dc.contributor.author | ChookhachizadehMoghaddam, MH | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-26T08:31:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-26T08:31:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1996 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/52189 | |
dc.description.abstract | The accuracy and prediction capability of the linear double log-log (LDL-L), mixture response-surface (MR-S) and the combined nearly ideal binary solvent/Redlich-Kister (CNIBS/R-K) solubility equations have been compared using the model parameters calculated from either the whole data or a minimum number of data in an experimental set. The CNIBS/R-K model produced better prediction for some experimental sets than the other two models when the parameters obtained from the whole data in a set were employed, whereas the LDL-L model was superior to the other models when the parameters calculated from a minimum number of data were used, indicating its greatest prediction capability. | |
dc.language.iso | English | |
dc.relation.ispartof | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS | |
dc.subject | solubility prediction cosolvency | |
dc.subject | binary solvent systems | |
dc.subject | linear double log-log model | |
dc.subject | mixture response-surface method | |
dc.subject | combined nearly ideal binary solvent Redlich-Kister equation | |
dc.title | Comparison of double log-log, mixture response-surface and combined NIBS/Redlich-Kister solubility models | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.citation.volume | 144 | |
dc.citation.issue | 1 | |
dc.citation.spage | 127 | |
dc.citation.epage | 130 | |
dc.citation.index | Web of science | |
dc.identifier.DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(96)04717-5 | |