نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم

dc.contributor.authorTubbs, RS
dc.contributor.authorLoukas, M
dc.contributor.authorSlappey, JB
dc.contributor.authorShoja, MM
dc.contributor.authorOakes, WJ
dc.contributor.authorSalter, EG
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T08:28:55Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T08:28:55Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/51654
dc.description.abstractDiscrepancies abound in the literature regarding the anatomy and incidence of the C1 dorsal roots, ganglia, and rami. The present study was performed to elucidate further the detailed anatomy of these structures and to review their clinical relevance. Thirty-adult cadavers were used for this study. The mean age for this group was 72 years. C1 and C2 spinal nerves were identified in 100% of the specimens examined. In 46.6% of specimens, C1 dorsal rootlets were identified and of these, 28.5% had an associated dorsal root ganglion. In 50% of specimens, the spinal accessory nerve joined with dorsal rootlets of C1. C1 in these cases did not possess a dorsal root ganglion. There were no significant differences between left sides, gender, and age (P > 0.05). Additional knowledge regarding the C1 dorsal roots, ganglia, and rami may be of use to the clinician who treats various pain syndromes including medically and surgically intractable occipital neuralgia.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofCLINICAL ANATOMY
dc.titleClinical anatomy of the C1 dorsal root, ganglion, and ramus: A review and anatomical study
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume20
dc.citation.issue6
dc.citation.spage624
dc.citation.epage627
dc.citation.indexWeb of science
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20472


فایلهای درون آیتم

فایلهاسایزفرمتنمایش

هیچ فایل مرتبطی وجود ندارد

این آیتم در مجموعه های زیر مشاهده می شود

نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم