dc.contributor.author | Navali, AM | |
dc.contributor.author | Rouhani, A | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-26T08:27:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-26T08:27:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/51285 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study compares the active ranges of finger motion and rupture rates of two-strand and four-strand repairs in zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations in young children. A total of 29 patients (under the age of 4 years) with 32 flexor tendon lacerations in zone 2 were evaluated. The injured tendons were randomly repaired with either two-strand or four-strand modified Strickland techniques. At a mean follow-up period of I I months, the mean total active motion of interphalangeal joints was 156 degrees in the two-strand and 158 degrees in the four-strand group. According to the Strickland original method, this means an average of 89% (range 57-100%) of normal function in the two-strand and 90% (range 60-100%) in the four-strand group. There were no ruptures of the four-strand repairs, but one two-strand repair failed within 3 weeks of the repair. Statistically, we were not able to show any significant difference in the active ranges of finger motion achieved with two-strand and four-strand repairs. | |
dc.language.iso | English | |
dc.relation.ispartof | JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME | |
dc.subject | flexor tendon repair | |
dc.subject | zone 2 | |
dc.subject | children | |
dc.subject | two-strand and four-strand technique | |
dc.title | Zone 2 flexor tendon repair in young children: A comparative study of four-strand versus two-strand repair | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.citation.volume | 33E | |
dc.citation.issue | 4 | |
dc.citation.spage | 424 | |
dc.citation.epage | 429 | |
dc.citation.index | Web of science | |
dc.identifier.DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193408090761 | |