Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPesianian, I
dc.contributor.authorMesbahi, A
dc.contributor.authorShafaee, A
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T08:15:53Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T08:15:53Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/51063
dc.description.abstractBackground. Designing and shielding of an appropriate radiography room has been one of the major concerns of radiation scientists since the first decade after the invention of X-rays. Recently, report No.147 of National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) has been published. In this study the researchers have investigated the effect of new report recommendation on primary and secondary barriers thicknesses in comparison to NCRP 49, and 116 recommendations. Materials and Methods: To calculate the walls thickness of a conventional radiography room, the workload of a radiography room of a university hospital was determined by recording the number of exposures, mAs and kVp for each patient during six months. Three types of calculations were done: (1) Using NCRP 49 formulations and dose limits (2) Using the NCRP 49 formulations and NCRP116 dose limits and (3) Using the NCRP 147 recommendations. Results: The estimated workload was 172 mA min wk(-1) for the studied radiography room which was slightly lower than the workload recommended by NCRP147. The results showed that using the NCRP49 formulation and NCRP116 dose limits, the barriers thickness increases substantially. Moreover, the dose limits were lower in NCRP 147, using the third method. The primary barrier thickness is decreased considerably in comparison to two other methods. For the secondary barrier the results of the two methods (1) and (3) did not differ and remained the same. Conclusion: Application of NCRP 49 and NCRP116 dose limits for radiography room shielding (second method) overestimated the primary and secondary barriers thickness, significantly. But, applying NCRP 147, not only the new dose limits were considered, but also the cost of primary barrier construction was reduced. Iran. J. Radiat. Res., 2009; 6 (4): 183-188
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofIRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH
dc.subjectRadiography shielding
dc.subjectNCRP147
dc.subjectNCRP116
dc.subjectNCRP49
dc.titleShielding evaluation of a typical radiography department: a comparison between NCRP reports No.49 and 147
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume6
dc.citation.issue4
dc.citation.spage183
dc.citation.epage188
dc.citation.indexWeb of science
dc.citation.URLhttps://ijrr.com/article-1-490-en.html&sw=Shielding+Evaluation+of+A+Typica


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record