dc.contributor.author | Yaghobi, Z | |
dc.contributor.author | Goljarian, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Oskouei, AE | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-26T07:55:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-26T07:55:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/48568 | |
dc.description.abstract | [Purpose] The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of tap water (drinking water) and normal saline (sodium chloride solution 0.9%) iontophoresis treatment for a patient with idiopathic hyperhidrosis [Subjects and Methods] In this study, tap water and normal saline iontophoresis were used to treat a 21 year-old female who was suffering from severe palmoplantar idiopathic hyperhidrosis. Post-iontophoresis sweat intensity of 8 treatment sessions were averaged and then normalized relative to the corresponding mean value which was obtained before iontophoresis treatment. [Results] The subject showed 24.72% and 42.01% decreases in sweat intensity following tap water and normal saline iontophoresis, respectively. [Conclusion] Tap water and normal saline iontophoresis are effective in the treatment of idiopathic hyperhidrosis. However, normal saline iontophoresis is 1.7 times more effective than tapwater iontophoresis at obstructing secretion. | |
dc.language.iso | English | |
dc.relation.ispartof | JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE | |
dc.subject | Hyperhidrosis | |
dc.subject | Iontophoresis | |
dc.subject | Saline solution | |
dc.title | Comparison of Tap Water and Normal Saline Iontophoresis in Idiopathic Hyperhidrosis: A Case Report | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.citation.volume | 26 | |
dc.citation.issue | 8 | |
dc.citation.spage | 1313 | |
dc.citation.epage | 1315 | |
dc.citation.index | Web of science | |
dc.identifier.DOI | https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1313 | |