نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم

dc.contributor.authorBachour, SP
dc.contributor.authorHevesi, M
dc.contributor.authorBachour, O
dc.contributor.authorSweis, BM
dc.contributor.authorMahmoudi, J
dc.contributor.authorBrekke, JA
dc.contributor.authorDivani, AA
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T07:28:15Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T07:28:15Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/46953
dc.description.abstractThe use of rodent stroke models allow for the understanding of stroke pathophysiology. There is currently no gold standard neurological assessment to measure deficits and recovery from stroke in rodent models. Agreement on a universal preclinical stroke scale allows for comparison of the outcomes among conducted studies. The present study aimed to compare three routinely used neurological assessments in rodent studies (i.e., Garcia, Modo, and Longa) to determine which is most effective for accurately and consistently quantifying neurological deficits in the context of focal middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo) in rats. Focal MCAo was induced in 22 male Wistar rats using a novel transfemoral approach. Rodents were assessed for neurological deficit pre-injury as well as 3 and 24 h post-injury. Data was analyzed to determine Pearson correlation coefficients in addition to McNemar's chi(2) values between each pair of neurological assessments. All three stroke scales, Garcia, Modo, and Longa, showed statistically significant changes between the baseline and the 3-hour neurological assessments. A trend towards neurological recovery was observed in all three stroke scales between the 3 and 24-hour endpoints. The three scales were highly correlated with each other, with Garcia and Modo having the strongest correlation. Of the three pairwise analyses, the comparison between the Garcia and Longa tests demonstrated the highest McNemar's chi(2) value, indicating least marginal homogeneity between these two tests. The combination of high correlation between Garcia and Modo tests along with greatest marginal heterogeneity observed between the Garcia and Longa test lead us to recommend the use of Garcia and Longa neurological scales when researchers are hoping to capture the broadest range of neurological factors using only two stroke scales. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
dc.subjectStroke
dc.subjectRodents
dc.subjectRodent stroke scale
dc.subjectNeurological assessments
dc.subjectMiddle cerebral artery occlusion
dc.subjectRodent behavioral assessments
dc.titleComparisons between Garcia, Modo, and Longa rodent stroke scales: Optimizing resource allocation in rat models of focal middle cerebral artery occlusion
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume364
dc.citation.spage136
dc.citation.epage140
dc.citation.indexWeb of science
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.03.029


فایلهای درون آیتم

فایلهاسایزفرمتنمایش

هیچ فایل مرتبطی وجود ندارد

این آیتم در مجموعه های زیر مشاهده می شود

نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم