نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم

dc.contributor.authorAslanabadi, N
dc.contributor.authorMoghadam, SV
dc.contributor.authorKazemi, B
dc.contributor.authorFouladi, DF
dc.contributor.authorVaseghi, G
dc.contributor.authorEshraghi, A
dc.contributor.authorMahmoodian, M
dc.contributor.authorTutunchi, S
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T07:22:27Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T07:22:27Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier10.2174/1574887111666160916124004
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/46271
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: There are no reliable non-invasive markers of restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCIs). The aim of our study was to measure changes incorrected QT interval (QTc), corrected QT dispersion (QTcd), corrected T wave peak to end interval (TPEc) and corrected TPE dispersion (TPEcd) after PCI and to determine whether restenosis subsequently affects these indices. Methods: From 211 patients, who underwent successful PCI, 202 patients were referred for repeated coronary angiography in order to exclusion of coronary restenosis and included in this analysis. QTc, QTcd, TPEc and TPEcd indices were calculated just before PCI and 24 hours later. Results: Comparing pre procedural with post procedural results, median QTc and median QTcd decreased significantly after PCI procedure (from 447 to 440 ms, p= 0.017 and from 46 to 40 ms, p= 0.005; respectively). Corresponding changes of TPEc and TPEcD were not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis showed higher amounts of QTcd changes [Exp(B): 1.033, 95% CI: 1.018-1.051; P= 0.025] and younger age[Exp(B): 1.074, 95% CI: 1.038-1.112; P= 0.023] as independent predictors of restenosis. Area under the ROC curve indicated good predictive performance of QTcd changes (Delta QTcd) [AUC: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.51-0.86, P = 0.03] and age [AUC 0.68, 95% CI 0.62-0.74, p = 0.04] for restenosis after PCI. The best cut-off point for Delta QTcd was 6 msec, and for age was 52 years. The sensitivity and specificity of Delta QTcd >= 6 ms to detect coronary restenosis were 73.2% and 71.4% respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of age was also similar, the sensitivity and specificity of age <= 52 years were 68.1% and 74.3% respectively. Conclusion: The Higher differences between pre and post PCI QTcd may be an inexpensive and simple predictor of restenosis after a previously successful coronary angioplasty. It seems that these findings encourage us to re-think about using QTcd as a simple ECG predictor for sustained coronary patency after angioplasty.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofREVIEWS ON RECENT CLINICAL TRIALS
dc.subjectCoronary angiography
dc.subjectECG
dc.subjectpercutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs)
dc.subjectQT dispersion
dc.subjectrestenosis
dc.subjectTPEcd
dc.titleQT Dispersion and Age; Independent Predictors of Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume12
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage38
dc.citation.epage43
dc.citation.indexWeb of science
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2174/1574887111666160916124004


فایلهای درون آیتم

فایلهاسایزفرمتنمایش

هیچ فایل مرتبطی وجود ندارد

این آیتم در مجموعه های زیر مشاهده می شود

نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم