Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmiri, H
dc.contributor.authorGhodrati, N
dc.contributor.authorNikuyeh, M
dc.contributor.authorShams-Vahdati, S
dc.contributor.authorJalilzadeh-Binazar, M
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T07:21:43Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T07:21:43Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/46158
dc.description.abstractObjectives: One of the irritating features of migraine is emesis that can compromise taking oral medications. We designed this study to compare the effectiveness of granisetron and metoclopramide in reducing pain and treating emesis in migraine patients. Methods: We included a total of 148 patients with migraine headache presenting to two referral hospitals in a prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. We compared the effect of granisetron (2 mg intravenous) with metoclopramide (10 mg intravenous). Pain intensity and emesis episodes were recorded before drug administration, one, two and four 4 h after drug administration. Results: Of the 148 patients, 47 were male and 101 were female. 75 patients received granisetron and 73 metoclopramide. Mean pain intensity before the administration of the medications was 7.67 +/- 1.30 in granisetron group and 7.68 +/- 1.13 in metoclopramide group with an insignificant difference. Mean pain intensity at one, two, and 4 h after drug administration was 3.20 +/- 1.37, 2.39 +/- 1.28, and 1.31 +/- 0.52 in granisetron group and 5.04 +/- 1.77, 4.1 +/- 1.8, and 1.56 +/- 0.68 in metoclopramide group (P = 0.03). Mean emesis episodes before drug administration were 1.85 +/- 0.81 and 1.80 +/- 0.77 in granisetron and metoclopramide groups, respectively. These episodes were 1.33 +/- 0.66, 0.25 +/- 0.49, and 0.04 +/- 0.19 in granisetron group and 1.38 +/- 0.73, 0.21 +/- 0.47, and 0.41 +/- 0.19 in metoclopramide group at one, two, and 4 h after the drug administration (P = 0.7). Conclusion: To came in conclusion, compared to metoclopramide, granisetron is a better choice in acute migraine ATTACK because it decreases the patients' pain as well as their emesis. Copyright (C) 2017 The Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the Owner. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofTURKISH JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
dc.subjectMigraine
dc.subjectHeadache
dc.subjectGranisetron
dc.subjectMetoclopramide
dc.subjectPain
dc.titleComparison of granisetron and metoclopramide in the treatment of pain and emesis in migraine patients: A randomized controlled trial study
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume17
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage61
dc.citation.epage64
dc.citation.indexWeb of science
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2016.12.004


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record