نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم

dc.contributor.authorJamshidi, A
dc.contributor.authorGharibdoost, F
dc.contributor.authorVojdanian, M
dc.contributor.authorSoroosh, SG
dc.contributor.authorSoroush, M
dc.contributor.authorAhmadzadeh, A
dc.contributor.authorNazarinia, MA
dc.contributor.authorMousavi, M
dc.contributor.authorKarimzadeh, H
dc.contributor.authorShakibi, MR
dc.contributor.authorRezaieyazdi, Z
dc.contributor.authorSahebari, M
dc.contributor.authorHajiabbasi, A
dc.contributor.authorEbrahimi, AA
dc.contributor.authorMahjourian, N
dc.contributor.authorRashti, AM
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T07:18:58Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T07:18:58Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/45461
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of test-adalimumab (CinnoRA (R), CinnaGen, Iran) to the innovator product (Humira (R), AbbVie, USA) in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial, a total of 136 patients with active RA were randomized to receive 40 mg subcutaneous injections of either CinnoRA (R) or Humira (R) every other week, while receiving methotrexate (15 mg/week), folic acid (1 mg/day), and prednisolone (7.5 mg/day) over a period of 24 weeks. Physical examinations, vital sign evaluations, and laboratory tests were conducted in patients at baseline and at 12-week and 24-week visits. The primary endpoint in this study was the proportion of patients achieving moderate and good disease activity score in 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR)-based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response. The secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for 20% (ACR20), 50% (ACR50), and 70% (ACR70) responses along with the disability index of health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), and safety. Results: Patients who were randomized to CinnoRA (R) or Humira (R) arms had comparable demographic information, laboratory results, and disease characteristics at baseline. The proportion of patients achieving good and moderate EULAR responses in the CinnoRA (R) group was non-inferior to the Humira (R) group at 12 and 24 weeks based on both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations (all p values >0.05). No significant difference was noted in the proportion of patients attaining ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses in the CinnoRA (R) and Humira (R) groups (all p values >0.05). Further, the difference in HAQ scores and safety outcome measures between treatment arms was not statistically significant. Conclusion: CinnoRA (R) was shown to be non-inferior to Humira (R) in terms of efficacy at week 24 with a comparable safety profile to the reference product.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY
dc.subjectAdalimumab
dc.subjectBiosimilar
dc.subjectCinnoRA (R)
dc.subjectRheumatoid arthritis
dc.titleA phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active controlled, and non-inferiority clinical trial to compare efficacy and safety of biosimilar adalimumab (CinnoRA (R)) to the reference product (Humira (R)) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis
dc.typeArticle
dc.citation.volume19
dc.citation.indexWeb of science
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1371-4


فایلهای درون آیتم

فایلهاسایزفرمتنمایش

هیچ فایل مرتبطی وجود ندارد

این آیتم در مجموعه های زیر مشاهده می شود

نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم