Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaviani, F
dc.contributor.authorEsmaeili, F
dc.contributor.authorBalayi, E
dc.contributor.authorPourfattollah, N
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T06:33:46Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T06:33:46Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/43833
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate x-ray protection methods in dental offices in Tabriz.In this study 142 dental offices were evaluated. A questionnaire-based method was used. The data was analyzed by descriptive methods.The least commonly used methods were leaded walls (4.9%) and film badges (16.9%) and the most commonly used methods were lead partitions (67.6%) and position-distance rule (68.3%). The most commonly used patient protection devices were E-speed films (84.5%) and long collimators (66.2%). The least commonly used methods, in this respect, were automatic processors (2.1%) and rectangular collimators (0%).Regarding protection methods for the patient, results did not conform to international standards. Mostly, manual processing was used, resulting in extra radiation dose to patients. The methods which reduce the received dose of patients were disregarded in offices compared to educational centers, necessitating optimization of educational programs in these fields.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects
dc.titleEvaluation of X-ray Protection Methods Used in Dental Offices in Tabriz in 2005-2006.
dc.typearticle
dc.citation.volume1
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage49
dc.citation.epage52
dc.citation.indexPubmed
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2007.008


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record