نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم

dc.contributor.authorSadeghi Bazargani, H
dc.contributor.authorHajebrahimi, S
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T06:14:54Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T06:14:54Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/43058
dc.description.abstractTo discuss the methodological considerations of a standard and applicable randomized clinical trial (RCT).Using a predefined strategy, we conducted systematic computerized search of the MEDLINE (1966 to 2011) and EMBASE (1980 to 2011) databases to identify all English language educational articles discussing the RCT methodological aspects. Full text versions of identified studies were reviewed in blinded fashion for key methodological and statistical characteristics.Randomized clinical trials in surgery are the highest level of the primary research evidence in evidence-based medicine. There is increasing demand for implementation of RCTs in urological daily practice.Randomized clinical trials' report should be absolutely clear, simple, and easy to understand with well-defined internal and external validity. Efforts should be made to design high quality RCTs in urology. There are substantial needs for urologists to their knowledge about RCT.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofUrology journal
dc.subjectDouble-Blind Method
dc.subjectEvidence-Based Medicine
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subjectSingle-Blind Method
dc.subjectUrology
dc.titleEvidence-based urology: how does a randomized clinical trial achieve its designed goals?
dc.typearticle
dc.citation.volume8
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage88
dc.citation.epage96
dc.citation.indexPubmed


فایلهای درون آیتم

فایلهاسایزفرمتنمایش

هیچ فایل مرتبطی وجود ندارد

این آیتم در مجموعه های زیر مشاهده می شود

نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم