نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم

dc.contributor.authorMohseni, MA
dc.contributor.authorSoleimanpour, J
dc.contributor.authorMohammadpour, H
dc.contributor.authorShahsavari, A
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T06:14:13Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T06:14:13Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/42990
dc.description.abstractAlthough the intramedullary nailing is thought to be the method of choice for treatment of closed tibial shaft, there is ongoing debate on the optimal surgical approach in patients with open types of these fractures. In addition, choosing between the reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing is still an issue for the orthopedic surgeons. In present study, we aimed to compare the outcome and consequences of OA tubular external fixation vs. unreamed intramedullary nailing in open grade IIIA-IIIB tibial shaft fractures. In a randomized clinical trial, 50 patients with open tibial shaft fractures (grades IIIA-IIIB) were recruited in Tabriz Shohada teaching centre in a 2-year period of time. They randomized in two equal groups underwent either AO tubular external fixation or unreamed intramedullary nailing. These 2 groups were matched for sex, age and fracture-grade. The follow-up time was one year. Union time, surgical outcome, postoperative complications and the ambulation time were compared between the two groups. Twenty five patients, 20 males and 5 females with a mean age of 30.80 +/- 5.24 years were allocated in unreamed intramedullary group and 25 other patients, 22 males and 3 females with a mean age of 28.92 +/- 8.88 years were studied in the external fixation group (p = 0.70 and 0.37, respectively). The two groups were matched for sex (p = 0.70) and age (p = 0.37). The time of union was 3, 4, 5 and 6 < or = weeks after operation in 28, 12, 32 and 28% of the cases in unreamed intramedullary group vs. 4, 12, 48 and 36% of the cases in external fixation group, respectively (p = 0.14). Post-operative infection, soft tissue injury, malunion and nonunion were documented in 16, 8, 0 and 4% of the cases in unreamed intramedullary group vs. 32, 12, 24 and 8% of the cases in external fixation group, respectively (p = 0.19, 0.50, 0.02 and 0.50, respectively). The mean ambulation time after operation was 2.92 +/- 2.43 weeks in the unreamed intramedullary nailing group vs. 2.68 +/- 2.14 weeks in the external fixation group (p = 0.71). Our results are in favor of unreamed intramedullary nailing against external fixation in treatment of open tibial shaft fractures.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofPakistan journal of biological sciences : PJBS
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFracture Fixation
dc.subjectFracture Fixation, Intramedullary
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPostoperative Complications
dc.subjectTibial Fractures
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.titleAO tubular external fixation vs. unreamed intramedullary nailing in open grade IIIA-IIIB tibial shaft fractures: a single-center randomized clinical trial.
dc.typearticle
dc.citation.volume14
dc.citation.issue8
dc.citation.spage490
dc.citation.epage5
dc.citation.indexPubmed


فایلهای درون آیتم

فایلهاسایزفرمتنمایش

هیچ فایل مرتبطی وجود ندارد

این آیتم در مجموعه های زیر مشاهده می شود

نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم