Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKimyai, S
dc.contributor.authorOskoee, SS
dc.contributor.authorMohammadi, N
dc.contributor.authorRikhtegaran, S
dc.contributor.authorBahari, M
dc.contributor.authorOskoee, PA
dc.contributor.authorVahedpour, H
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T06:08:01Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T06:08:01Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/42260
dc.description.abstractThis study compared the effects of two mechanical surface preparation techniques, air abrasion and Nd:YAG laser, with the use of two adhesive systems, self-etch and etch and rinse, on the repair bond strengths of an indirect composite resin. One hundred fifty cylindrical samples of an indirect composite resin were prepared and randomly divided into six groups (n?=?25). In groups 1-3, the composite resin surfaces were respectively prepared as follows: no roughening, roughening by air abrasion, and roughening by Nd:YAG laser, followed by application of an etch-and-rinse adhesive. In groups 4-6, the preparation techniques were respectively the same as those in groups 1-3, followed by application of a self-etch adhesive. Subsequently, a direct composite resin was added and repair bond strengths were measured. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test. Mean bond strength value was significant based on the preparation technique (P?<?0.001), i.e., in air abrasion and Nd:YAG laser groups, bond strengths were significantly higher compared to no-preparation groups (P?<?0.0005). There were significant differences in bond strength values between air abrasion and Nd:YAG laser groups, with significantly higher values in air abrasion groups (P?<?0.0005). However, there were no significant differences in bond strength values between the adhesive systems. Furthermore, the cumulative effects of the adhesive system and the surface preparation technique were not significant. Surface preparation of the indirect composite resin with air abrasion and Nd:YAG laser resulted in a significant increase in the repair bond strength, with air abrasion being more effective. There were no significant differences in bond strength between the two adhesives.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofLasers in medical science
dc.subjectAdhesives
dc.subjectAir Abrasion, Dental
dc.subjectComposite Resins
dc.subjectDental Bonding
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis
dc.subjectLasers, Solid-State
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Atomic Force
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning
dc.subjectResin Cements
dc.subjectResins, Synthetic
dc.subjectStress, Mechanical
dc.subjectSurface Properties
dc.titleEffect of different mechanical and chemical surface treatments on the repaired bond strength of an indirect composite resin.
dc.typearticle
dc.citation.volume30
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage653
dc.citation.epage9
dc.citation.indexPubmed
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1391-5


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record