dc.contributor.author | Alizadeh Oskoee, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Mohammadi, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Ebrahimi Chaharom, ME | |
dc.contributor.author | Kimyai, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Pournaghi Azar, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Rikhtegaran, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Shojaeei, M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-26T06:08:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-26T06:08:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/42258 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background and aims. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect ofsurface treatment with Er; Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO2 lasers on repair shear bond strength of a silorane-based composite resin. Materials and methods. Sixty eight cylindrical samples of a silorane-based composite resin (Filtek Silorane) were pre-pared and randomly divided into 4 groups as follows: group 1: without surface treatment; groups 2, 3 and 4 with surface treatments using Er; Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO2 lasers, respectively. A positive control group (group 5) was assigned in order to measure cohesive strength. Repair shear bond strength values were measured and data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and a post hoc Tukey test at a significance level of ?=0.05. Results. There were statistically significant differences in repair shear bond strength values between group 2 and other groups (P < 0.05); and between group 1and groups 3and 4 (P < 0.001); however, there were no significant differences be-tween groups 3 and 4 (P = 0.91). Conclusion. The repair shear bond strength of silorane-based composite resin was acceptable by surface treatment with lasers. | |
dc.language.iso | English | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects | |
dc.title | Effect of Surface Treatment with Er;Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO2 Lasers on Repair Shear Bond Strength of a Silorane-based Composite Resin. | |
dc.type | article | |
dc.citation.volume | 7 | |
dc.citation.issue | 2 | |
dc.citation.spage | 61 | |
dc.citation.epage | 6 | |
dc.citation.index | Pubmed | |
dc.identifier.DOI | https://doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2013.011 | |