Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAjami, AA
dc.contributor.authorJafari Navimipour, E
dc.contributor.authorSavadi Oskoee, S
dc.contributor.authorAbed Kahnamoui, M
dc.contributor.authorLotfi, M
dc.contributor.authorDaneshpooy, M
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T06:07:26Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T06:07:26Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/42173
dc.description.abstractBackground and aims. Present study was designed to compare the bonding strength of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and composite resin to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), MTA mixed with Na2HPO4 (NAMTA), and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM). Materials and methods. Thirty specimens of each CEM, NAMTA, and MTA were prepared. Composite and RMGI restorations were then placed on the samples (15 samples in six subgroups). Shear bond strength was assessed using universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test. To compare the bond strength in subgroups, one-away ANOVA was applied. Significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results. Bond strength was significantly higher to composite samples compared to RMGI samples (p<0.001). The difference in bond strength of composite samples between MTA and CEM subgroups (P=0.026) as well as MTA and NAMTA subgroups (P= 0.019) was significant, but the difference between NAMTA and CEM subgroups (P=0.56) was not significant. The differences in bond strength in subgroups of RMGI group were not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion. Regarding shear bond strength to the tested substrates, composite was shown to be superior to RMGI. The bond of resin composite to MTA was weaker than that to CEM and NAMTA.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects
dc.titleComparison of shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin to three pulp capping agents.
dc.typearticle
dc.citation.volume7
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.spage164
dc.citation.epage8
dc.citation.indexPubmed
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2013.026


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record