نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم

dc.contributor.authorAmiri Pichakolaei, A
dc.contributor.authorFahimi, S
dc.contributor.authorBakhshipour Roudsari, A
dc.contributor.authorFakhari, A
dc.contributor.authorAkbari, E
dc.contributor.authorRahimkhanli, M
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T05:46:10Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T05:46:10Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/41004
dc.description.abstractThe present study aimed to investigate the metacognitive model of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), through a comparative study of thought fusion beliefs and thought control strategies between patients with OCD, depression, and normal people.This is a causal-comparative study. About 20 patients were selected with OCD, and 20 patients with major depression disorder (MDD), and 20 normal individuals. Participants completed a thought fusion instrument and thought control questionnaire. Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance.RESULTS indicated that patients with OCD obtained higher scores than two other groups. Also, there was a statistical significant difference between the three groups in thought control strategies and punishment, worry, and distraction subscales.Therefore, the results of the present study supported the metacognitive model of obsessive and showed thought fusion beliefs and thought control strategies can be effective in onset and continuity of OCD.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofIranian journal of psychiatry and behavioral sciences
dc.titleA comparative study of thought fusion beliefs and thought control strategies in patient with obsessive-compulsive disorder, major depressive disorder and normal people.
dc.typearticle
dc.citation.volume8
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.spage33
dc.citation.epage41
dc.citation.indexPubmed


فایلهای درون آیتم

فایلهاسایزفرمتنمایش

هیچ فایل مرتبطی وجود ندارد

این آیتم در مجموعه های زیر مشاهده می شود

نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم