نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم

dc.contributor.authorMehnati, P
dc.contributor.authorTirtash, MJ
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T05:41:42Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T05:41:42Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/40536
dc.description.abstractSensitivity and specificity are the two most important indicators in selection of medical imaging devices for cancer screening. Breast images taken by conventional or digital mammography, ultrasound, MRI and optical mammography were collected from 2,143,852 patients. They were then studied and compared for sensitivity and specificity results. Optical mammography had the highest sensitivity (p<0.001 and p<0.006) except with MRI. Digital mammography had the highest specificity for breast cancer imaging. A comparison of specificity between digital mammography and optical mammography was significant (p<0.021). If two or more breast diagnostic imaging tests are requested the overall sensitivity and specificity will increase. In this literature review study patients at high-risk of breast cancer were studied beside normal or sensitive women. The image modality performance of each breast test was compared for each.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms
dc.subjectComparative Effectiveness Research
dc.subjectEarly Detection of Cancer
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subjectMammography
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificity
dc.subjectUltrasonography, Mammary
dc.titleComparative Efficacy of Four Imaging Instruments for Breast Cancer Screening.
dc.typearticle
dc.citation.volume16
dc.citation.issue15
dc.citation.spage6177
dc.citation.epage86
dc.citation.indexPubmed


فایلهای درون آیتم

فایلهاسایزفرمتنمایش

هیچ فایل مرتبطی وجود ندارد

این آیتم در مجموعه های زیر مشاهده می شود

نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم